[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG

Nurani Nimpuno nurani at netnod.se
Mon Feb 9 14:31:31 CET 2015

Thanks Andrei. 

This is my interpretation as well. Good to hear Jari express it this way. 


On 9 feb 2015, at 20:59, Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky at isoc.org> wrote:

> FYI. There is some discussion going on in the IETF (IANAPLAN WG) on how
> to answer Alissa's question.
> IMO, the proposals are indeed incompatible only if the IETF opposes the
> change. And only in this case an action would be required from our side.
> Andrei
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG
> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:48:23 +0800
> From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>
> To: Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>
> CC: ianaplan at ietf.org
> The IETF proposal did not set it as a requirement that ownership of
> IANA.ORG be transferred as a part of the transition. The RIR community
> needs to think if they believe it really is a requirement. But I guess that
> the question for us is from the IETF perspective, if other communities
> believe they need that, is the IETF community OK with that? If we are,
> there are some implications to the IETF Trust, some rules to think about
> for various future same/different/partially different IANA operator
> scenarios,
> and some negotiations about these. I think we can set most of that aside
> for the moment, as details to worry about later. But what is the high-level
> guidance from the IETF community on this?
> From my perspective the question that we should try to answer at the
> IETF is as follows. While we are (in my opinion) not changing our
> proposal - it stays at the “not required” state, is the IETF community
> OK with a change of ownership? The IETF and RIR proposals are
> only incompatible if they require the change _and_ we oppose it.
> FWIW, my read of the earlier discussion in IANAPLAN was that
> our opinion was “not required” rather than that we’d oppose it. If
> that is right, then the answer is perhaps that we’d be fine with
> that. Do I read that right, and what do others think?
> Jari
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp

More information about the CRISP mailing list