[CRISP-TEAM] Feedbackk on the ianaxfer list

[Andrei Robachevsky]

I support sending this message.

Andrei

Izumi Okutani wrote on 06/02/15 16:15:
> CRISP Team,
> 
> 
> Good to see some community feedback on the ianaxfer list.
> 
> As discussed at the call yesterday, we will not repond to the comment
> from Richard Hill.
> 
> OTOH, I feel we should clarify on the mailing list that we are not
> replying, based on our decision and not due to neglecting.
> I also discused with Alan here in Singapore and he agrees.
> 
> I would therefore like to post to the "CRISP - Process Concerns" thread
> of the ianxfer list below.
> 
> In addition, I feel we should explicitly share the feedback received on
> the ianaxfer list to icg-forum, as it seems not all ICG members read and
> keep track of ianaxfer list.
> 
> If you have any comments, please sharein the next  24 hours, UTC16:00
> 6th Feb.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Izumi
> 
> 
> ---
> To: ianaxfer list
> 
> Colleagues,
> 
> Thank you to all who have shared your feedback on this mailing list.
> As we had requested for feedback as reference to the ICG, we feel it
> would be more appropriate for the community members and exchange
> opinions among yourselves rather than the CRISP Team intervening in the
> discussions.
> We therefore currently do not plan to respond to the discussions unless
> there is clear guidance from the ICG.
> 
> Regards,
> Izumi Okutani
> The CRISP Team
> 
> ---
> To: icg-forum
> Dear Alissa and the ICG members,
> 
> 
> As a reference for the ICG, following are the feedback received so far
> for the CRISP Team's reponses to the two comments submitted to icg-forum.
> 
>  https://www.nro.net/pipermail/ianaxfer/2015-February/date.html
> 
> [NRO-IANAXFER] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "CRISP -	ProcessConcerns"
>   Richard Hill
> [NRO-IANAXFER] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "CRISP -	ProcessConcerns"
>   Jim Reid
> [NRO-IANAXFER] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "CRISP -	ProcessConcerns"
>   Seun Ojedeji
> [NRO-IANAXFER] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "CRISP -	ProcessConcerns"
>   Richard Hill
> [NRO-IANAXFER] [cooperation-wg] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "Process
> concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "   Nick Hilliard
> [NRO-IANAXFER] [cooperation-wg] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to	"Process
> concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "   Jim Reid
> [NRO-IANAXFER] [cooperation-wg] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "Process
> concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "   Filiz Yilmaz
> [NRO-IANAXFER] [cooperation-wg] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "Process
> concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "   Rob Evans
> [NRO-IANAXFER] [cooperation-wg] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "Process
> concern regarding the RIR proposal development process "   Gerard Ross
> [NRO-IANAXFER] [cooperation-wg] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to "CRISP -
> Process Concerns"   Nick Hilliard
> [NRO-IANAXFER] [cooperation-wg] Fwd: The CRISP Team Response to	"CRISP -
> Process Concerns"   Jim Reid
> 
> I hope this gives you some ideas on how some members of the number
> resources community view our response.
> 
> As we had requested for feedback as reference to the ICG, we feel it
> would be more appropriate for the community members and exchange
> opinions among yourselves rather than the CRISP Team intervening in the
> discussions.
> We therefore currently do not plan to respond to the discussions unless
> there is clear guidance from the ICG.
> 
> Thank you for your attention and please let us know if you feel any
> additional information or clarifications from the CRISP Team would be
> helpful for the ICG.
> 
> 
> Yours Sincerely,
> 
> Izumi Okutani
> Chair, the CRISP Team
> ---
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>