[CRISP-TEAM] ver.2 Re: Draft response to comments to ICG-Forum on process concern
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Wed Feb 4 16:40:55 CET 2015
On 2015/02/05 0:18, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Feb 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> I made three changes from the last draft response I sent to the list.
>> Thanks Paul and Andr�s for explicitly expressing support for Andrei's
>> suggested text.
> I support this new text.
> I think that these messages (both this one, in response to Guru Acharya,
> and the other one in response to Richard Hill) should be sent to the
> ianaxfer list as well as the icg forum. The ICG secifically asked us to
> consider the messages sent to icg-forum as if they had been input to our
> process. (See <http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00025.html>.)
Indeed and my plan is to:
1. Respond to icg-forum with cc to CRISP Team only, as we are responding
to the comment there as the CRISP Team.
2. Then, point to the link to the post in 1 to icg-forum and share that
we had made our response on the IANAXFER list.
At this point, we ask for feedback from the IANAXFER list for our
response, including explicit support.
I'd like to request the CRISP Team members to share this in your
regional list as well and call for feedback including support.
Hope this makes sense and open to hear any feedback about this approach.
More information about the CRISP