[CRISP-TEAM] Draft response to comments to ICG-Forum on process concern

Mwendwa Kivuva Kivuva at transworldafrica.com
Wed Feb 4 14:31:48 CET 2015


I support the response

______________________
Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya

"There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on
higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson


On 4 February 2015 at 16:12, Andres Piazza <andres at lacnic.net> wrote:

> Same here.
>
> El 4/2/15 a las 14:04, Paul Rendek escribió:
>
>  Hey Izumi,
>>
>> I have no concerns with Andrei's text. It's a fine suggestion.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> On 2/4/15 10:12 AM, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>>
>>> Andrei and all,
>>>
>>>
>>> Many thanks to all CRISP members who have shared your feedback.
>>>
>>> I very much like this suggested text by Andrei and note about the need
>>> to fix the URL. Sounds less defensive and express the point we consider
>>> as important.
>>>
>>> I was hoping to share the updated version earlier but had been caught in
>>> other things before flying tomorrow - I will be off-line for the next 2
>>> hours but I intend get back to the list with the updated draft response
>>> in about coming 3 hours, around UTC13:00.
>>>
>>> In the meantime, if anyone has concerns about incorporating Andrei's
>>> suggested text, please share your comment on the list.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Izumi
>>>
>>> On 2015/02/04 6:04, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>
>>>> Izumi,
>>>>
>>>> This is a very clear response and I support it. I have one suggestion
>>>> regarding on of the last paragraphs of the response (below), but i am
>>>> not insisting on it.
>>>>
>>>> And a nitpick:
>>>>
>>>>>     https://nro/net/crisp-team
>>>>>
>>>> This URL doesn't work for me.
>>>>
>>>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 03/02/15 18:29:
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>> As discussed at length in various CRISP teleconferences, it was felt
>>>>> that in identifying the processes of proposal development and its
>>>>> implementation, it required a solid understanding of the CRISP team's
>>>>> remit and responsibility. As Guru Archaya notes, this remit was not
>>>>> explicitly spelled out by the original CRISP proposal, but was
>>>>> identified through CRISP discussions over the duration of the process
>>>>> and incorporating community input made publicly at the time. We believe
>>>>> that the proposal submitted to the ICG fulfils that remit, while not
>>>>> extending into areas beyond the authority or expertise of the CRISP
>>>>> team.
>>>>>
>>>>>  While developing the proposal the CRISP team was conscious about its
>>>> remit and responsibility. While addressing issues and the elements of
>>>> the proposal the team felt that it was important to identify the
>>>> critical components and implementation requirements, rather than work
>>>> out the actual implementation details. Our position was that the latter
>>>> should be developed by qualified RIR legal teams following the best
>>>> practices in this field. As stated in the response "[d]uring the
>>>> drafting process, the RIRs are expected to consult their respective RIR
>>>> communities, and that the drafting process will be guided by the
>>>> principles..."
>>>>
>>>> We believe that the proposal submitted to the ICG meets the expectations
>>>> of the numbers community, while not extending into areas beyond the
>>>> authority or expertise of the CRISP team.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Andrei
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150204/cf09b591/attachment.html>


More information about the CRISP mailing list