[CRISP-TEAM] Next Steps & the CRISP Team

[Axel Pawlik]

Izumi, all,

in my view you have summarised very well, this is exactly how I would
describe it, certainly for step 2.

Looking ahead into step 3 and 6 time, personally I think it might be
useful if the CRISP team was still operational to take on a coordinating
role, if community feedback and / or ICG interaction would warrant it.

Never change a winning team! :-)

Seeing that Singapore is close... Would you think it would be a good
idea if those of the CRISP team, NRO EC, ICG reps from the numbering
world would meet up for an exchange?
Maybe Tuesday afternoon?

cheers, Axel

> 
> I would appreciate your guidance as Chair of NRO and ICG members
> representing NRO, on any possible role expected of the CRISP Team in
> future steps.
> 
>  https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icg-process-timeline-07jan15-en.pdf
> 
> 
> In Step 2:
> When the ICG has questions about the proposal from the numbers
> community, my current assumption is as below:
> 
>  - The CRISP Team is to support Paul and Adiel in responding to
>    request for clarifications/questions from the ICG.
>  - Paul/Adiel will be the interface with the ICG but there may be cases
>    where the CRISP Team is expected to respond directly to the ICG.
> 
> Would this be a fair assumption?
> Please advice if there is anything different from your understanding.
> 
> 
> In Step 3 and Step 6:
> When communities review the straw man proposal, is there any role
> expected of the CRISP Team at this phase?
> 
> 
> I don't have a strong opinion and be happy to support Paul and Adiel's
> coordination efforts as the CRISP Team if considered desirable, in where
> we can.
> 
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> Izumi Okutani
> Chair, the CRISP Team
>