[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: Re: Next Steps & the CRISP Team

[Izumi Okutani]

Hi John,


Noted and we'll miss you and other members who will not be in Singapore.
Will certainly update you on the discussions, especially on how we are
expected to be involved in future steps.


Izumi

On 2015/02/02 23:56, Sweeting, John wrote:
> Hi Izumi,
> 
> I will not be there but as you have indicated Bill and Michael will be. I
> think it would be good to have a representative from LACNIC as well. I
> look forward to seeing your notes from the meet up.
> 
> Thanks and enjoy Singapore!
> 
> -john
> 
> On 2/2/15, 7:42 AM, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
>> CRISP Team, especially those who will be in Singapore,
>>
>>
>> As you have seen in my e-mail with Axel, there is a suggestion to get
>> together CRISP team, NRO EC, ICG reps from the numbering community.
>>
>> I think it's a good idea and the current suggested date is Tuesday
>> afternoon.
>>
>> Could we go ahead and accept this suggested date for the meeting?
>>
>> May have been good if the meet up could be before the Monday ICG session
>> but if the main topic is about the timeline and future steps, I don't
>> think this needs to be sorted before the Monday session.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Plus, it would be good to know who from the CRISP Team will be in
>> Singapore:
>>
>>From past e-mail posts I note: Alan, Bill, Michael, Nurani, Paul will be
>> there and I probably haven't captured everyone. Anyone from the LACNIC
>> region?
>>
>>
>>
>> Izumi
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [CRISP-TEAM] Next Steps & the CRISP Team
>> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 21:32:43 +0900
>> From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
>> To: Axel Pawlik <axel.pawlik at ripe.net>, Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net>,
>> Adiel Akplogan <adiel at afrinic.net>
>> CC: crisp at nro.net <crisp at nro.net>
>>
>> Axel,
>>
>>
>> Many thanks for your response and sharing your view.
>>
>>> in my view you have summarised very well, this is exactly how I would
>>> describe it, certainly for step 2.
>>
>> This is helpful to know.
>>
>>> Looking ahead into step 3 and 6 time, personally I think it might be
>>> useful if the CRISP team was still operational to take on a coordinating
>>> role, if community feedback and / or ICG interaction would warrant it.
>>>
>>> Never change a winning team! :-)
>>
>> :) Noted and would certainly be interested to hear if Paul/Adiel has
>> other comments.
>>
>>> Seeing that Singapore is close... Would you think it would be a good
>>> idea if those of the CRISP team, NRO EC, ICG reps from the numbering
>>> world would meet up for an exchange?
>>> Maybe Tuesday afternoon?
>>
>> That's a good idea and thanks for this suggestion.
>>
>> Tuesday afternoon works for me personally - let me check with the CRISP
>> team members who will be in Singapore and get back to you again.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Izumi
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2015/02/02 20:50, Axel Pawlik wrote:
>>>
>>> Izumi, all,
>>>
>>> in my view you have summarised very well, this is exactly how I would
>>> describe it, certainly for step 2.
>>>
>>> Looking ahead into step 3 and 6 time, personally I think it might be
>>> useful if the CRISP team was still operational to take on a coordinating
>>> role, if community feedback and / or ICG interaction would warrant it.
>>>
>>> Never change a winning team! :-)
>>>
>>> Seeing that Singapore is close... Would you think it would be a good
>>> idea if those of the CRISP team, NRO EC, ICG reps from the numbering
>>> world would meet up for an exchange?
>>> Maybe Tuesday afternoon?
>>>
>>> cheers, Axel
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would appreciate your guidance as Chair of NRO and ICG members
>>>> representing NRO, on any possible role expected of the CRISP Team in
>>>> future steps.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icg-process-timeline-07jan15
>>>> -en.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In Step 2:
>>>> When the ICG has questions about the proposal from the numbers
>>>> community, my current assumption is as below:
>>>>
>>>>    - The CRISP Team is to support Paul and Adiel in responding to
>>>>      request for clarifications/questions from the ICG.
>>>>    - Paul/Adiel will be the interface with the ICG but there may be
>>>> cases
>>>>      where the CRISP Team is expected to respond directly to the ICG.
>>>>
>>>> Would this be a fair assumption?
>>>> Please advice if there is anything different from your understanding.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In Step 3 and Step 6:
>>>> When communities review the straw man proposal, is there any role
>>>> expected of the CRISP Team at this phase?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't have a strong opinion and be happy to support Paul and Adiel's
>>>> coordination efforts as the CRISP Team if considered desirable, in
>>>> where
>>>> we can.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Izumi Okutani
>>>> Chair, the CRISP Team
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> 
> 
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
>