[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: Re: Next Steps & the CRISP Team

[Andres Piazza]

Tuesday afternoon works for me too.

Andrés

El 2/2/15 a las 9:59, Nurani Nimpuno escribió:
> On 2 feb 2015, at 13:42, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>
>> CRISP Team, especially those who will be in Singapore,
>>
>>
>> As you have seen in my e-mail with Axel, there is a suggestion to get
>> together CRISP team, NRO EC, ICG reps from the numbering community.
>>
>> I think it's a good idea and the current suggested date is Tuesday
>> afternoon.
>>
>> Could we go ahead and accept this suggested date for the meeting?
>>
>> May have been good if the meet up could be before the Monday ICG session
>> but if the main topic is about the timeline and future steps, I don't
>> think this needs to be sorted before the Monday session.
>>
>> What do you think?
> I agree. Makes sense, and Tuesday afternoon works for me.
> Nurani
>
>> Plus, it would be good to know who from the CRISP Team will be in Singapore:
>>
>>  From past e-mail posts I note: Alan, Bill, Michael, Nurani, Paul will be
>> there and I probably haven't captured everyone. Anyone from the LACNIC
>> region?
>>
>>
>>
>> Izumi
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [CRISP-TEAM] Next Steps & the CRISP Team
>> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 21:32:43 +0900
>> From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
>> To: Axel Pawlik <axel.pawlik at ripe.net>, Paul Wilson <pwilson at apnic.net>,
>> Adiel Akplogan <adiel at afrinic.net>
>> CC: crisp at nro.net <crisp at nro.net>
>>
>> Axel,
>>
>>
>> Many thanks for your response and sharing your view.
>>
>>> in my view you have summarised very well, this is exactly how I would
>>> describe it, certainly for step 2.
>> This is helpful to know.
>>
>>> Looking ahead into step 3 and 6 time, personally I think it might be
>>> useful if the CRISP team was still operational to take on a coordinating
>>> role, if community feedback and / or ICG interaction would warrant it.
>>>
>>> Never change a winning team! :-)
>> :) Noted and would certainly be interested to hear if Paul/Adiel has
>> other comments.
>>
>>> Seeing that Singapore is close... Would you think it would be a good
>>> idea if those of the CRISP team, NRO EC, ICG reps from the numbering
>>> world would meet up for an exchange?
>>> Maybe Tuesday afternoon?
>> That's a good idea and thanks for this suggestion.
>>
>> Tuesday afternoon works for me personally - let me check with the CRISP
>> team members who will be in Singapore and get back to you again.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Izumi
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2015/02/02 20:50, Axel Pawlik wrote:
>>> Izumi, all,
>>>
>>> in my view you have summarised very well, this is exactly how I would
>>> describe it, certainly for step 2.
>>>
>>> Looking ahead into step 3 and 6 time, personally I think it might be
>>> useful if the CRISP team was still operational to take on a coordinating
>>> role, if community feedback and / or ICG interaction would warrant it.
>>>
>>> Never change a winning team! :-)
>>>
>>> Seeing that Singapore is close... Would you think it would be a good
>>> idea if those of the CRISP team, NRO EC, ICG reps from the numbering
>>> world would meet up for an exchange?
>>> Maybe Tuesday afternoon?
>>>
>>> cheers, Axel
>>>
>>>> I would appreciate your guidance as Chair of NRO and ICG members
>>>> representing NRO, on any possible role expected of the CRISP Team in
>>>> future steps.
>>>>
>>>>   https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icg-process-timeline-07jan15-en.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In Step 2:
>>>> When the ICG has questions about the proposal from the numbers
>>>> community, my current assumption is as below:
>>>>
>>>>   - The CRISP Team is to support Paul and Adiel in responding to
>>>>     request for clarifications/questions from the ICG.
>>>>   - Paul/Adiel will be the interface with the ICG but there may be cases
>>>>     where the CRISP Team is expected to respond directly to the ICG.
>>>>
>>>> Would this be a fair assumption?
>>>> Please advice if there is anything different from your understanding.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In Step 3 and Step 6:
>>>> When communities review the straw man proposal, is there any role
>>>> expected of the CRISP Team at this phase?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't have a strong opinion and be happy to support Paul and Adiel's
>>>> coordination efforts as the CRISP Team if considered desirable, in where
>>>> we can.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Izumi Okutani
>>>> Chair, the CRISP Team
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp