[CRISP-TEAM] Next Steps & the CRISP Team

[Izumi Okutani]

Axel,


Many thanks for your response and sharing your view.

> in my view you have summarised very well, this is exactly how I would
> describe it, certainly for step 2.

This is helpful to know.

> Looking ahead into step 3 and 6 time, personally I think it might be
> useful if the CRISP team was still operational to take on a coordinating
> role, if community feedback and / or ICG interaction would warrant it.
>
> Never change a winning team! :-)

:) Noted and would certainly be interested to hear if Paul/Adiel has
other comments.

> Seeing that Singapore is close... Would you think it would be a good
> idea if those of the CRISP team, NRO EC, ICG reps from the numbering
> world would meet up for an exchange?
> Maybe Tuesday afternoon?

That's a good idea and thanks for this suggestion.

Tuesday afternoon works for me personally - let me check with the CRISP
team members who will be in Singapore and get back to you again.



Cheers,
Izumi



On 2015/02/02 20:50, Axel Pawlik wrote:
> 
> Izumi, all,
> 
> in my view you have summarised very well, this is exactly how I would
> describe it, certainly for step 2.
> 
> Looking ahead into step 3 and 6 time, personally I think it might be
> useful if the CRISP team was still operational to take on a coordinating
> role, if community feedback and / or ICG interaction would warrant it.
> 
> Never change a winning team! :-)
> 
> Seeing that Singapore is close... Would you think it would be a good
> idea if those of the CRISP team, NRO EC, ICG reps from the numbering
> world would meet up for an exchange?
> Maybe Tuesday afternoon?
> 
> cheers, Axel
> 
>>
>> I would appreciate your guidance as Chair of NRO and ICG members
>> representing NRO, on any possible role expected of the CRISP Team in
>> future steps.
>>
>>   https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icg-process-timeline-07jan15-en.pdf
>>
>>
>> In Step 2:
>> When the ICG has questions about the proposal from the numbers
>> community, my current assumption is as below:
>>
>>   - The CRISP Team is to support Paul and Adiel in responding to
>>     request for clarifications/questions from the ICG.
>>   - Paul/Adiel will be the interface with the ICG but there may be cases
>>     where the CRISP Team is expected to respond directly to the ICG.
>>
>> Would this be a fair assumption?
>> Please advice if there is anything different from your understanding.
>>
>>
>> In Step 3 and Step 6:
>> When communities review the straw man proposal, is there any role
>> expected of the CRISP Team at this phase?
>>
>>
>> I don't have a strong opinion and be happy to support Paul and Adiel's
>> coordination efforts as the CRISP Team if considered desirable, in where
>> we can.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Izumi Okutani
>> Chair, the CRISP Team
>>
>