[CRISP-TEAM] [Feedback requested] Discussions on delaying CCWG Timelines

Sweeting, John john.sweeting at twcable.com
Fri Dec 18 16:36:13 CET 2015


I agree with the suggestion below, it seems to be a fair and open way to
go.

On 12/18/15, 3:58 AM, "crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of Izumi Okutani"
<crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

>Good suggestion Andrei.
>
>We can share the intended response to the ianaxfer list before sending it
>to the CCWG.
>I understand your point Andrei, we should be careful, especially when
>speaking on behalf of the numbers community, which is not directly about
>the proposal itself.
>
>I agree, let's share with the wider numbers community before we make any
>statement to the CCWG.
>It is very much in line with what we have been doing throughout the
>process.
>
>Thank you Mwendwa for your feedback to support making our voice on this.
>What you expressed is along the lines of my thinking, and I think
>Andrei's suggestion doesn't contradict.
>
>Nurani has also expressed support to make a comment.
>She is now out of office therefore sent me a quick feedback individually.
>
>I'll wait to see if there are any other comments until UTC14:30, 24 hours
>from my request for feedback.
>If no concerns are expressed I will share it on the ianaxfer list.
>
>Feedback continues to be welcome, including further clarifications, or
>even just an explicit support.
>
>
>Thanks,
>Izumi
>
>On 2015/12/18 17:31, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>> Thank you Izumi,
>>
>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 18/12/15 04:27:
>>> Does this additional background change your opinion or do you still
>>>feel the same?
>>> (If you still feel the same, fair enough and I understand)
>>
>> I understand and agree that the overall timeline is important, my
>> concern is that we are overstretching our own mandate. But I also see
>> Mwendwa's point the the CRISP Team is de-facto an informal voice of the
>> numbers community as far as the transition is concerned.
>>
>> Perhaps we should share the intended reply on the iana-xfer list prior
>> to sending it to the CCWG?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CRISP mailing list
>CRISP at nro.net
>https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp


________________________________

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.



More information about the CRISP mailing list