[CRISP-TEAM] [Feedback requested] Discussions on delaying CCWG Timelines
robachevsky at isoc.org
Fri Dec 18 09:31:57 CET 2015
Thank you Izumi,
Izumi Okutani wrote on 18/12/15 04:27:
> Does this additional background change your opinion or do you still feel the same?
> (If you still feel the same, fair enough and I understand)
I understand and agree that the overall timeline is important, my
concern is that we are overstretching our own mandate. But I also see
Mwendwa's point the the CRISP Team is de-facto an informal voice of the
numbers community as far as the transition is concerned.
Perhaps we should share the intended reply on the iana-xfer list prior
to sending it to the CCWG?
More information about the CRISP