[CRISP-TEAM] Root Zone Maintainer transition

[Izumi Okutani]

Thanks Bill for sharing this - apologies this came through over the weekend and just realised this post.

It probably would be good to share with the RIRs.
I think this would be good to share as a reference to the global list, as it may be of an interest for some members of our community to know this, in the wider context of how it affects the process of updating the root zone.

I don't know if the CRISP Team would be in a position to share our comment on this, in the context of affecting the number community proposal.
That's just my initial impression and would be interested to hear from the others.


Izumi


On 2015/08/22 4:31, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> So, this is the other shoe dropping.  Do we have any comment on it?  Noting that it’s not so much an open-and-transparent-bottom-up-multistakeholder process, so we’re not being _asked_ for input on it.  But it certainly affects us, as constituents of the IANA function and users of .ARPA.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                 -Bill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>