[CRISP-TEAM] Actions
Izumi Okutani
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Wed Aug 19 16:24:15 CEST 2015
Hi all,
Nurani, I totally agree with your observation.
Thanks very much Michael for compiling our responses - I think this covers inputs from the CRISP Team up to now.
What I think worth adding are:
* Support for the transition itself and NTIA criteria - that this is consistent with the spirit of the Internet and how it has developed, operates today
Excellent idea Nurani to reference the ISOC paper where appropriate
* Emphasize the bottom up process and support from the community - this was the case for the number resources community through the RIR process as well as global discussions, trust other operational communities has had an equivalent community support
* Support for the ICG process - it has respected bottom up process by each of the operational communities and has adequately incorporated the proposals
* We would like the transition to take place in a timely manner - strongly encourage the each operational communities and CCWG to continue working to keep the target timelines including its implementation
For the IANA Numbering Services, we trust and work together with RIRs where appropriate, in preparing its implementation consistent with the timelines
I think all can fit into Q.12.
For other questions, I think we should clarify that we have intentionally focused on the number community proposal if we keep it as is.
For Q. 3 Q.4, it may make our observation more convincing that each of the IANA functions are generally independent therefore, by each of the operational community coming up with proposal for each of the elements and combining them basically addresses essential points.
I'll be off-line from now until tomorrow morning in Japan but will follow up more as needed.
Izumi
On 2015/08/19 22:54, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you so much for putting this together Michael.
>
> As a general comment, when reading this again (including my contribution), I feel that our response might be a little bit too limited in scope, as it is almost only commenting on our own proposal.
>
> While we agreed to have a number community perspective, as this is the only one we can claim to represent, I feel that we may want to at least add some general comments about the combined proposal or the transition process.
>
> I believe we all feel that we can endorse the general direction of the proposal and that we can express stronger support of the ICG and the transition. We all know that it is important that the transition gets explicit support from the community in the coming months.
>
> I will try to see if I can propose language for this, but would very much also welcome comments or text suggestions from others in the team.
>
> Another possible addition could be to use some of the excellent points that ISOC make in its paper about the IANA Stewardship transition principles:
>
> https://www.internetsociety.org/sites/default/files/IANA-Transition-Perspectives-20150728-en.pdf
>
> They do not answer the evaluation questions from the ICG, but they explain why the NTIA criteria are really ingrained in the Internet and principles that the technical community hold.
>
> Any other thoughts on this?
>
> Nurani
>
>
>> On 19 aug 2015, at 14:40, Michael Abejuela <mabejuela at arin.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hello CRISP Team,
>>
>> I hope you are all well. As requested, please find attached a document
>> compiling the responses to the ICG call for comment drafted by various
>> members of the team. I have endeavored to compile the comments and have
>> made some edits for clarification, consistency, grammar, etc. None of the
>> edits were meant to change any of the substance of the comments received
>> thus far; however, I do ask the CRISP Team, particularly the authors of
>> the various responses, to review and confirm that the intent of the
>> responses is accurately reflected in this document. Please comment on
>> this mailing list if there are any questions or desired edits.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Michael
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael R. Abejuela
>> Associate General Counsel
>> ARIN
>> 3635 Concorde Parkway
>> Suite 200
>> Chantilly, VA 20151
>> (703) 227-9875 (p)
>> (703) 263-0111 (f)
>> mabejuela at arin.net
>>
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
>> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
>> and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, copy, use,
>> disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
>> copies of the original message.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/17/15, 12:37 PM, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>>
>>> CRISP Team,
>>>
>>>
>>> For the response to the ICG, please share your feedback within 24 hours
>>> after Michael has compiled the responses,
>>>
>>> I encourage you call to take a good look, whether it flows well overall
>>> and gives supportive enough message to the ICG and our process, once the
>>> combined response is circulate from Michael.
>>> (I will do the same)
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>>> Q.1-4 : https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-August/002146.html
>>>> Q.5-6 : https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-August/002147.html
>>>> Q.7-9 : https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-August/002158.html
>>>> Q.10-12: https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-August/002159.html
>>>
>>> These are the responses, which I think covers all questions from the ICG.
>>> Please let me know if there is anything you'd like to confirm for your
>>> work - thanks for volunteering as always!
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Izumi
>>>
>>> On 2015/08/13 19:11, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>>>> CRISP Team,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please see the actions needed and share your feedback.
>>>>
>>>> I know we have a lot on our plate during the holiday season, but your
>>>> feedback is important as we are entering into coordination phase in
>>>> finalising the proposal.
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> 1. Comment on the CRISP Team revised charter [Thu 13th Aug, UTC 13:00]
>>>> https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-August/002162.html
>>>>
>>>> Fix by : Fri 14th Aug and send to the NRO EC
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> 2. Observation on Sidley's IPR memo [Fri 14th Aug COB]
>>>> https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-August/002157.html
>>>>
>>>> Share with CWG Chairs : Mon 17th Aug (Izumi & Nurani)
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> 3. Comment on ICG proposal [Fri 14th Aug] COB]
>>>> Q.1-4 : https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-August/002146.html
>>>> Q.5-6 : https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-August/002147.html
>>>> Q.7-9 : https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-August/002158.html
>>>> Q.10-12: https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-August/002159.html
>>>>
>>>> Compile : Mon 17th Aug (Michael)
>>>> Share on ianaxfer at nro.net : Mon 17th or Tue 18th Aug (Depending on
>>>> CRISP feedback) (Izumi & Nurani)
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> 4. SLA ver.3 [Feeback online: Mon 24th Aug]
>>>> SLA ver.2 : https://www.nro.net/sla
>>>> (Clean)
>>>> https://www.nro.net/sla-track-changes
>>>> (Redline)
>>>> Responses to SLA feedback: https://www.nro.net/sla-comments
>>>>
>>>> Discuss at CRISP call : Wed 26th Aug
>>>> Finalize : Fri 28th Aug
>>>> Submit : Mon 31st Aug (deadline: UTC23:59)
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Izumi
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>> <CRISP team response to the call for public comment on the combined proposal.docx>_______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>
More information about the CRISP
mailing list