[CRISP-TEAM] [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IPR Memo

[Bill Woodcock]

> On Aug 7, 2015, at 8:01 AM, Sweeting, John <john.sweeting at twcable.com> wrote:
> My initial reaction is pretty much the same as some of the comments on the ianaplan list. This very much reads as if the conclusion was made and then the document was written to support the conclusion. In discussing with other members of the ARIN community it seems to be “opinions” than “legal points” and I agree.

My take on it is the same as John’s.  We seem to be getting railroaded by the Names’ folks interests, as was kinda predictable that we would.  I guess the bottom line is that I don’t want any objections from us to add to the delays they’ve already created, and I’m willing to compromise on this issue as long as everyone is _really clear_ that we can go our own way as soon as we like, so if they screw this up, it won’t affect us long-term.

                                -Bill




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150809/fe54b967/signature.asc>