Andrei Robachevsky robachevsky at isoc.org
Fri Aug 7 16:24:54 CEST 2015

Hi Izumi,

Izumi Okutani wrote on 07/08/15 11:59:
> CRISP Team,
> This is what I have communicated to the CWG Chairs. IANAPLAN and ICG Chairs are in this e-mail thread as well.
> I had suggested earlier to include Alan and Paul Wilson in the dialogue as ICG reps from NRO.
> Nurani and I believe this call should not be a negotiation call about the contents of the proposal.
> I'd like to have some time to think about suggestion 3 in Jonathan's e-mail and also discuss with Nurani.
> In the meantime, I welcome to hear feedback from the CRISP Team on any views you may have.
> My initial question would be what does this small group do and how do we select who will join.

Yes, very good point. My personal opinion is that opening up the numbers
proposal for modifications is a bad idea. The numbers community was very
clear about the requirement that the trademark and iana.org domain are
not associated with a particular IANA Numbering Services Operator (ICANN
is the current model).

I think forming the team Jonathan suggested makes sense, but if the
objective is to explore how we can meet the needs of other communities
within this requirement.

As to the composition, I think having representatives from the RIRs
would be helpful.


More information about the CRISP mailing list