[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IPR Memo
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Fri Aug 7 15:58:43 CEST 2015
As a follow up on this -
Please feel below a draft statement and let me know if you have any feedback.
I would like this to be shared to CWG, so they know we are planning to share our observation.
There are several speculations about the numbers community position, and some people speaking on our behalf (with good intentions) but we need to accurately express our position in our own words.
I'd like to share this at 01:00am UTC on Mon 10th Aug, so that they can wait to hear from us before making further speculations about our opinion.
As you can see, this is just a placeholder that we'll come back with comments.
I have not mentioned anything about details of the legal input/any other points to raise on IPR as it would be better to communicate this after our CRISP call.
Dear Jonathan, Lise and CWG members,
The CRISP Team have started sharing observations on the legal input from Sidely. Once we have completed summarising our obervation, we would like to share it with the CWG, together with any general observation on IPR on the IANA trademark and iana.org domain.
We acknowledge the suggested way forward discussed at the CWG call on Thursday 6 August, which was shared by Jonathan and Lise.
We will discuss this suggestion as well and will get back to you through Jonathan and Lise if we have any feedback.
Izumi Okutani & Nurani Nimpuno
Chair, Vice-Chair, The CRISP Team
On 2015/08/07 18:17, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> Excellent suggestion. I have received a request from the CWG Chairs to start coordination on this, which I will share in the next e-mail.
> To expand, I'd also like to suggest that:
> * Share the CRISP Team observation on Sidley's memo and share on the ianaxfer list as well as to the CWG (through the CWG Chairs perhaps)
> Target: next week
> * State the above plan in the next 12 hours
> We are frequently refered in the CWG discussions and we should give clarify about our plan/position
> Please start sharing your observations per Scenario before the CRISP Team call next week.
> 1. ICANN Maintains Ownership of IANA IPR (Scenario 1)
> 2. PTI Becomes the Registered Owner of the IANA IPR (Scenario 2)
> 3. An Independent Trust Becomes the Registered Owner of the IANA IPR (Scenario 3)
> It's good to see the discussions have started on Scenario 2.
> German, as requested before, please confirm if we could arrange the CRISP Team call next week.
> The suggested dates are Wed 12th or Thu 13th.
> Would be great if you could set a doodle to see team's availabilities but if there is not time, whichever date that works for you and the NRO Secretariat is fine.
More information about the CRISP