[CRISP-TEAM] [COB 4th Aug] Call for volunteers & timelines for submission
Janvier Noulaye
jnoulaye at gmail.com
Thu Aug 6 12:56:57 CEST 2015
OK, thank you Izumi, I'll do with Q9.
Regards
/Janvier
2015-08-06 11:38 GMT+01:00 Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>:
> Hi Janvier,
>
>
> Sure ofcourse, it's still not too late. Many thanks for volunteering!
>
> Would you help us for Q9?
>
> "Do you have any concerns that the proposal is replacing NTIA’s role with
> a government-led or inter-governmental organization solution? If yes,
> please explain why and what proposal modifications you believe are
> necessary. If not, please explain why."
>
> You can refer to our proposal on "V.E. Not a government led or inter
> governmental solution" and very briefly add observations about other two
> community proposals.
>
> It would be great if you could circulate the bullet points today or early
> tomorrow.
> I would then like the volunteers to work on brushing up the text early
> next week to discuss at the CRISP call, and if all goes smooth, hope to
> share this with the community within next week.
> (To encourage community submission)
>
> Hope this works for you and let me know if you have any questions.
>
>
> ---
> [Andrei]
> Q1. Completeness and clarity
> Q2. Compatibility and interoperability
> Q3. Accountability
> Q4. Workability
>
> [John]
> Q5. Supports and enhances the multistakeholder model
> Q6. Maintains the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS
>
> [Janvier]
> ## Q9. Any concerns that the proposal is replacing NTIA's role with a
> government-led or inter-governmental organization solution ##
> Tentative
>
> [Open to volunteers]
> Q7. Meets the needs and expectations of the global customers and partners
> of the IANA services
> Q8. Maintains the openness of the Internet
> Q10. The implementation of the proposal will continue to uphold the NTIA
> criteria in the future
> Q11. ICG report and executive summary accurately reflect all necessary
> aspects of the overall proposal
> Q12. Any general comments for the ICG about the proposal
> ---
>
>
> Thanks,
> Izumi
>
> On 2015/08/06 18:57, Janvier Noulaye wrote:
> > Hi Izumi,
> > Sorry for the delay (very busy with the end of the academy year
> > activities), I wondered If I could still catch up, for 1 question to
> > being assigned to me for drafting a response ?
> > Regards,
> > /Janvier Ngnoulaye
> >
> > 2015-08-04 23:11 GMT+01:00 Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>:
> >
> >> Thanks John that is very helpful! I really appreciate it.
> >>
> >> I'm hearing we may have one more volunteer so once fixed, I'll specify
> one
> >> or two questions where you can help ASAP, depending on what is
> remaining.
> >> Nurani and I will work on the rest.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Izumi
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2015/08/05 6:04, Sweeting, John wrote:
> >>> Hi Izumi,
> >>>
> >>> I am open to being assigned 1 or 2 of the questions for drafting a
> >>> response. Just let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> John
> >>>
> >>> On 8/3/15, 9:52 AM, "crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of Izumi Okutani"
> >>> <crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Excellent Andrei.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you very much for volunteering to work on Q2 and Q3.
> >>>>
> >>>> Indeed, most of the questions are covered either through our response
> to
> >>>> the CWG or in our proposal submission (Q.5 -Q.9), so we just need to
> >> make
> >>>> some broad additional points from the perspective of a single
> proposal.
> >>>> The most challenging one in my opinion is Q.10 but I'm sure this is
> >>>> something we are able to respond as well : We have not prepared a
> formal
> >>>> response but something we acknowledge as important to explain.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> [Andrei]
> >>>> Q2. Compatibility and interoperability
> >>>> Q3. Accountability
> >>>>
> >>>> [Open to volunteers]
> >>>> Q1. Completeness and clarity
> >>>> Q4. Workability
> >>>> Q5. Supports and enhances the multistakeholder model
> >>>> Q6. Maintains the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS
> >>>> Q7. Meets the needs and expectations of the global customers and
> >> partners
> >>>> of the IANA services
> >>>> Q8. Maintains the openness of the Internet
> >>>> Q9. Any concerns that the proposal is replacing NTIA�s role with a
> >>>> government-led or inter-governmental organization solution
> >>>> Q10. The implementation of the proposal will continue to uphold the
> NTIA
> >>>> criteria in the future
> >>>> Q11. ICG report and executive summary accurately reflect all necessary
> >>>> aspects of the overall proposal
> >>>> Q12. Any general comments for the ICG about the proposal
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Volunteers welcome on the remaining questions!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Izumi
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2015/08/03 22:36, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Izumi, team,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'll be happy to make a stab at drafting answers to questions 2 and
> 3.
> >>>>> As Mwendwa noted, most of these questions have been already discussed
> >> by
> >>>>> the team, and I'll be basing my draft on our prior communication
> >>>>> regarding the IETF and CWG proposals.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Andrei
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 03/08/15 13:21:
> >>>>>> CRISP Team,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd like to call for volunteers to draft CRISP response to 12
> >>>>>> questions from the ICG.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - Volunteers for any questions:
> >>>>>> Let us know how many questions you can help in drafting
> >>>>>> - If you wish to draft response to a particular question(s), please
> >>>>>> specify:
> >>>>>> Will assign on first come basis
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please express on the CRISP mailing list by the COB Tue 4th Aug if
> you
> >>>>>> can help.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You can contact Nurani and I individually for any questions if feel
> >>>>>> more comfortable that way.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Draft timelines: (Feedback welcome)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tue 10th Aug : Rough draft response per question
> >>>>>> Online feedback from the CRISP Team
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thu 12th Aug : Discussions at the CRISP call
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tue 18th/Wed 19th : Circulate draft final response online
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Wed 19 / Thu 20 : Final comment at the CRISP call
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mon 24th Aug : Merge the responses, share on the ianaxfer list
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thu 3rd Sep : Close comments from the ianaxfer list
> >>>>>> Focus on whether the CRISP Team response is not
> >>>>>> saying anything against community consensus.
> >>>>>> Each community members are encourage to make
> >>>>>> their own submission.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 8th Sep : Submission to the ICG with incorporated
> feedback
> >>>>> >from the ianaxfer list
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In addition to the two steps (rough & final drafts), I recommend the
> >>>>>> volunteers to share bullet points on core messages per question on
> 7th
> >>>>>> Fri and circulate to the CRISP list for feedback.
> >>>>>> This is too avoid the need to rework on draft response.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Izumi
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> CRISP mailing list
> >>>>>> CRISP at nro.net
> >>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> CRISP mailing list
> >>>> CRISP at nro.net
> >>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
> >> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject
> to
> >> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely
> >> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you
> >> are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified
> that
> >> any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to
> >> the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited
> and
> >> may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please
> notify
> >> the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy
> of
> >> this E-mail and any printout.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CRISP mailing list
> >> CRISP at nro.net
> >> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> >>
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150806/894fd8cc/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the CRISP
mailing list