[CRISP-TEAM] [COB 4th Aug] Call for volunteers & timelines for submission
Izumi Okutani
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Thu Aug 6 12:38:53 CEST 2015
Hi Janvier,
Sure ofcourse, it's still not too late. Many thanks for volunteering!
Would you help us for Q9?
"Do you have any concerns that the proposal is replacing NTIA’s role with a government-led or inter-governmental organization solution? If yes, please explain why and what proposal modifications you believe are necessary. If not, please explain why."
You can refer to our proposal on "V.E. Not a government led or inter governmental solution" and very briefly add observations about other two community proposals.
It would be great if you could circulate the bullet points today or early tomorrow.
I would then like the volunteers to work on brushing up the text early next week to discuss at the CRISP call, and if all goes smooth, hope to share this with the community within next week.
(To encourage community submission)
Hope this works for you and let me know if you have any questions.
---
[Andrei]
Q1. Completeness and clarity
Q2. Compatibility and interoperability
Q3. Accountability
Q4. Workability
[John]
Q5. Supports and enhances the multistakeholder model
Q6. Maintains the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS
[Janvier]
## Q9. Any concerns that the proposal is replacing NTIA's role with a government-led or inter-governmental organization solution ##
Tentative
[Open to volunteers]
Q7. Meets the needs and expectations of the global customers and partners of the IANA services
Q8. Maintains the openness of the Internet
Q10. The implementation of the proposal will continue to uphold the NTIA criteria in the future
Q11. ICG report and executive summary accurately reflect all necessary aspects of the overall proposal
Q12. Any general comments for the ICG about the proposal
---
Thanks,
Izumi
On 2015/08/06 18:57, Janvier Noulaye wrote:
> Hi Izumi,
> Sorry for the delay (very busy with the end of the academy year
> activities), I wondered If I could still catch up, for 1 question to
> being assigned to me for drafting a response ?
> Regards,
> /Janvier Ngnoulaye
>
> 2015-08-04 23:11 GMT+01:00 Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>:
>
>> Thanks John that is very helpful! I really appreciate it.
>>
>> I'm hearing we may have one more volunteer so once fixed, I'll specify one
>> or two questions where you can help ASAP, depending on what is remaining.
>> Nurani and I will work on the rest.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Izumi
>>
>>
>> On 2015/08/05 6:04, Sweeting, John wrote:
>>> Hi Izumi,
>>>
>>> I am open to being assigned 1 or 2 of the questions for drafting a
>>> response. Just let me know.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> John
>>>
>>> On 8/3/15, 9:52 AM, "crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of Izumi Okutani"
>>> <crisp-bounces at nro.net on behalf of izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Excellent Andrei.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for volunteering to work on Q2 and Q3.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, most of the questions are covered either through our response to
>>>> the CWG or in our proposal submission (Q.5 -Q.9), so we just need to
>> make
>>>> some broad additional points from the perspective of a single proposal.
>>>> The most challenging one in my opinion is Q.10 but I'm sure this is
>>>> something we are able to respond as well : We have not prepared a formal
>>>> response but something we acknowledge as important to explain.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [Andrei]
>>>> Q2. Compatibility and interoperability
>>>> Q3. Accountability
>>>>
>>>> [Open to volunteers]
>>>> Q1. Completeness and clarity
>>>> Q4. Workability
>>>> Q5. Supports and enhances the multistakeholder model
>>>> Q6. Maintains the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS
>>>> Q7. Meets the needs and expectations of the global customers and
>> partners
>>>> of the IANA services
>>>> Q8. Maintains the openness of the Internet
>>>> Q9. Any concerns that the proposal is replacing NTIA�s role with a
>>>> government-led or inter-governmental organization solution
>>>> Q10. The implementation of the proposal will continue to uphold the NTIA
>>>> criteria in the future
>>>> Q11. ICG report and executive summary accurately reflect all necessary
>>>> aspects of the overall proposal
>>>> Q12. Any general comments for the ICG about the proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Volunteers welcome on the remaining questions!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Izumi
>>>>
>>>> On 2015/08/03 22:36, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>>> Hi Izumi, team,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll be happy to make a stab at drafting answers to questions 2 and 3.
>>>>> As Mwendwa noted, most of these questions have been already discussed
>> by
>>>>> the team, and I'll be basing my draft on our prior communication
>>>>> regarding the IETF and CWG proposals.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 03/08/15 13:21:
>>>>>> CRISP Team,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to call for volunteers to draft CRISP response to 12
>>>>>> questions from the ICG.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Volunteers for any questions:
>>>>>> Let us know how many questions you can help in drafting
>>>>>> - If you wish to draft response to a particular question(s), please
>>>>>> specify:
>>>>>> Will assign on first come basis
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please express on the CRISP mailing list by the COB Tue 4th Aug if you
>>>>>> can help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can contact Nurani and I individually for any questions if feel
>>>>>> more comfortable that way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Draft timelines: (Feedback welcome)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tue 10th Aug : Rough draft response per question
>>>>>> Online feedback from the CRISP Team
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thu 12th Aug : Discussions at the CRISP call
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tue 18th/Wed 19th : Circulate draft final response online
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wed 19 / Thu 20 : Final comment at the CRISP call
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mon 24th Aug : Merge the responses, share on the ianaxfer list
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thu 3rd Sep : Close comments from the ianaxfer list
>>>>>> Focus on whether the CRISP Team response is not
>>>>>> saying anything against community consensus.
>>>>>> Each community members are encourage to make
>>>>>> their own submission.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 8th Sep : Submission to the ICG with incorporated feedback
>>>>> >from the ianaxfer list
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In addition to the two steps (rough & final drafts), I recommend the
>>>>>> volunteers to share bullet points on core messages per question on 7th
>>>>>> Fri and circulate to the CRISP list for feedback.
>>>>>> This is too avoid the need to rework on draft response.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Izumi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>
>>>
>>> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
>> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
>> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely
>> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you
>> are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that
>> any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to
>> the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and
>> may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify
>> the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of
>> this E-mail and any printout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>
More information about the CRISP
mailing list