[CRISP-TEAM] draft response to the combined proposal

Andrei Robachevsky robachevsky at isoc.org
Wed Aug 5 18:30:31 CEST 2015


Attached is a draft response to the first 4 (yes, could not resist! ;)
questions. Below is a summary:



1. Completeness and clarity:

- No dependency on the CCWG accountability mechanisms
- Clear requirements and level of detail for the implementation items to
be completed

2. Compatibility and interoperability:

- No compatibility issues wrt the IANA-related IPR as long ss the domain
names community and the protocol parameters community can accommodate
the specified requirements as part of their implementation
- No interoperability issues with new structures, since they are scoped
for names function
- Stress need to continuing coordination

3. Accountability:

- Accountability mechanism based on a contract and the ability to chose
another IFO if need arises
- This mechanism is separate and independent from the accountability
mechanisms proposed by the two other operational communities.

4. Workability:

- This proposal does not propose any new technical or operational
methods with regards to the IANA number function.
- Coordination is necessary in the overlapping areas
- Good track record
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CRISP response to combined proposal.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 132426 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150805/1dd24c0a/CRISPresponsetocombinedproposal-0001.docx>

More information about the CRISP mailing list