[CRISP-TEAM] Preparation for comment for the ICG proposal (Re: Announcement from the CRISP Team on the ICG proposal)

[Andrei Robachevsky]

Hi,

Agree with Izumi's and Nurani's comments.

Nurani Nimpuno wrote on 01/08/15 13:45:
> However, we might need to agree on the level of depth we want to respond on, and also what other messages we want in our response. 

I think we should also be clear regarding the scope of our response (as
we did before). In my opinion we are still looking at the combined
proposal purely from the numbers community perspective (as opposed to
"good for the Internet" - i.e. does the combined proposal work for us?

Just to give you an example of what I have in mind. The IANA operator
accountability matter is solved by different communities differently. So
as long as our solution (specifically contractual relationship with the
principles outlined in the proposal) is not affected by the combined
proposal we can positively answer Q3, regardless of what we think about
accountability mechanisms suggested by other communities.

I also think we need to be succinct in our response.

Regards,

Andrei