[CRISP-TEAM] Preparation for comment for the ICG proposal (Re: Announcement from the CRISP Team on the ICG proposal)

[Mwendwa Kivuva]

Hi All,

Looking at the 12 questions from ICG, I also feel we can adequately answer
them. I'm not sure what Nurani meant by "depth", but I am sure we have
answered some of these questions either in the CRISP proposal or on other
forums. For example, The five Questions on weather the proposal meets the
NTIA Criteria, I believe we have answered them before. That leaves us with
7 questions.

Sincerely,

______________________
Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya

"There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on
higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson


On 2 August 2015 at 19:38, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

> Hi Nurani, all,
>
>
> Yes, that totally makes sense. The first rough draft doesn't have to be
> complete in wording to focus more on agreeing as the CRISP Team on the core
> message we want to get across per question.
> We can brush it up based on the feedback from the CRISP Team in finalising
> the draft.
>
> Good idea to add a call Wed 19 / Thu 20 August.
> I would also like to suggest a call on 4th/7th Sep as a place holder, just
> before the submission.
>
> German, would you help us with a doodle poll on these two dates set of
> dates with the same time UTC13:00?
> Wed 19 or Thu 20 August and 4th/7th Sep.
>
> We can decide the dates of the two calls which works better for more team
> members.
>
> I'll share a draft timelines towards the submission on Monday.
>
>
>
> Izumi
>
> On 2015/08/01 20:45, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
> > Hi Izumi and all,
> >
> > Thanks for this. Your suggested approach makes sense to me.
> > I looked through the questions and I think they can be easily divided
> between us.
> >
> > However, we might need to agree on the level of depth we want to respond
> on, and also what other messages we want in our response.
> >
> > So I suggest we have two internal CRISP Team deadlines. One rough draft
> response with a round of comments with a CRISP call in between and then
> finalisation of the response. Does that make sense?
> >
> > I suggest we add an extra CRISP call on Wed 19 / Thu 20 August so we
> have the chance to discuss our response before we publish it on the
> ianaxfer list around 25 August.
> >
> > Let me know what you think about this!
> >
> > All the best,
> > Nurani
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 31 jul 2015, at 18:44, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> >>
> >> CRISP Team,
> >>
> >>
> >> As a seperate but related topics, we need to prepare for the 12
> questions from the ICG.
> >>
> >> One way we could do it is to seek for volunteers per question and
> review the draft within the CRISP Team.
> >> I would also like to share our response with ianaxfer at nro.net list in
> advance, say two weeks before the deadline, so that they have a chance to
> see if they are comfortable with our response.
> >>
> >> Any other suggestions on how we could prepare our comments efficiently
> would be welcome.
> >> I haven't discussed with Nurani so she may have other thoughts.
> >>
> >> I think it is very important that we get this part of the process right
> and get support for our comments from the number community.
> >>
> >> Let me know what you think.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Izumi
> >>
> >> On 2015/08/01 1:30, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> >>> CRISP Team,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please see below the draft text of announcement as the CRISP Team on
> the ICG proposal.
> >>> I welcome your comments until next Monday UTC15:00.
> >>>
> >>> Please help us outreach to your region on this announcement once
> released to the global ianaxfer list.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----
> >>> Dear Colleagues,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The CRISP Team is pleased to see the proposals from the three
> operational communities, protocol parameters, number resources and names
> are consolidated and is now published by the IANA Stewardship Transition
> Coordination Group (ICG).
> >>>
> >>> Public comment web site: https://comments.ianacg.org
> >>>
> >>> This is a key step in the process towards submission of the proposal
> developed by the multistakeholder community to the NTIA, with the proposal
> now out for the public comment until 8 September 2015 at 23:59 UTC.
> >>>
> >>> The CRISP Team will be submitting our comment and respond to the set
> of questions from the ICG, including our observations on whether the
> consolidated proposal appears compatible with the number community proposal.
> >>>
> >>> We encourage you to submit your comments during the public comment
> process from the number resources community.
> >>> The CRISP Team is planning to share our comment in advance on "
> ianaxfer at nro.net".
> >>>
> >>> If you would like to understand more about the consolidate proposal by
> the ICG, Webinars will be organized at:
> >>>
> >>> Thursday 6 August 2015 from 19:00-20:30 UTC (time zone convertor here:
> http://icgsec.asia/1fB5GMF)
> >>> Friday 7 August 2015 from 11:00-12:30 UTC (time zone convertor here:
> http://icgsec.asia/1IpVZfn)
> >>>
> >>>
> https://www.ianacg.org/iana-stewardship-transition-coordination-group-icg-to
> >>> -host-webinars-in-conjunction-with-call-for-public-comment
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>> Izumi Okutani, Nurani Nimpuno
> >>> Chair, Vice Chair, the CRISP Team
> >>> -----
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Izumi
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CRISP mailing list
> >> CRISP at nro.net
> >> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150803/eb2cd6c0/attachment.html>