[CRISP-TEAM] Milton's blogpost

[Izumi Okutani]

According to my understanding, this blog post is not suggesting any changes to the CRISP Team proposal.
We should certainly make this clear and state it, when someone suggests a such thing.


Izumi

On 2015/04/30 2:15, Mwendwa Kivuva wrote:
> We should also state that we cannot change any part of the CRISP proposal
> unless the community says so. I believe we  are agents of our respective
> communities
> 
> On Wednesday, 29 April 2015, Sweeting, John <john.sweeting at twcable.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Izumi,
>>
>> It was made very clear that Bill�s slides were not part of the CRISP Team
>> update, the title of the slides were even changed to reflect that and we
>> emphasized it more than once during the meeting. I think the best thing
>> here is for Bill to comment on Milton�s blog and set the record straight
>> since he is the one being quoted.
>>
>> Bill, do you mind doing that? Or what do you think is the right course
>> forward? I agree with Andrei that Milton�s comments are out of context and
>> factually wrong.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> John
>>
>> On 4/29/15, 10:55 AM, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp <javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015/04/29 23:38, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>> http://www.internetgovernance.org/2015/04/28/icann-wants-an-iana-function
>>>> s-monopoly-and-its-willing-to-wreck-the-transition-process-to-get-it/
>>>>
>>>> I am not happy with his statement that "the CRISP team was embroiled in
>>>> contentious negotiations with ICANN, and that ICANN legal was demanding
>>>> major changes in their plan", since it is factually wrong and implies
>>>> that we were negotiating in backrooms without involving or informing the
>>>> community.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for sharing this Andrei.
>>>
>>> To be fair to Milton, it was called the CRISP panel and it was shared by
>>> Bill who is the CRISP Team member, so it was a bit confusing but I agree
>>> it is not factually correct that the CRISP Team is involved in any
>>> discussions with ICANN.
>>>
>>> Perhaps we can communicate this to Milton, letting him know that it is
>>> not correct?
>>>
>>>
>>> Izumi
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net <javascript:;>
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>>
>> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
>> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
>> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely
>> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you
>> are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that
>> any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to
>> the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and
>> may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify
>> the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of
>> this E-mail and any printout.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net <javascript:;>
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
> 
>