[CRISP-TEAM] Thank you -- Re: Invitation to a panel discussion with the ICANN Board on 25 April

Tue Apr 28 05:52:28 CEST 2015

Hi German,

Thanks! I shared the link with ICANN.

As a minor point, I don't feel the need to have it highlighted with lines around this section - as it may give the impression we want to highlight this than our proposal.
Other than that, it's all good. Thanks.

Cheers,
Izumi

On 2015/04/28 8:18, German Valdez wrote:
> Hi
> 
> As requested, I have added a new section in the crisp team page in the nro website.
> 
> www.nro.net/crisp-team <http://www.nro.net/crisp-team>
> 
> Please let me know if you���d like any changes.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> German
> 
>> On 27 Apr 2015, at 1:16 pm, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>>
>> CRISP Team,
>>
>>
>> It is probably the best to first post the slides on the NRO website, then share the link with ICANN as a reference.
>> (They can add a link from their page if they think it's useful, if not that's also OK)
>>
>> We can add a section on the CRISP Team NRO website which says "Presentations by the CRISP Team" and add links to presentations which has been made:
>>
>> ICANN52 Singapore (2015/02/09: http://singapore52.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-icg-rfp-iana-stewardship/presentation-overview-number-resources-09feb15-en
>> Panel Discussions with the ICANN Board (2015/04/25): post link to the attached PDF
>>
>> We may want to take more time to consider where to post comprehensively but at this stage, I think it would be useful enough to have those links added in the first place.
>> Please share if you have other thoughts.
>>
>>
>>
>> German/NRO Secretariat,
>>
>> Would you be able to help me post the attacheds slides on the NRO CRISP Team website as mentioned above?
>> I am hoping share the link with ICANN soon without losing timing, for them to consider adding link from their page, if adequate.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Izumi
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Re: Thank you -- Re: Invitation to a panel discussion with the ICANN Board on 25 April
>> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:30:21 +0900
>> From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
>> To: Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart at icann.org>, steve at shinkuro.com <steve at shinkuro.com>
>> CC: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>, <jrobinson at afilias.info> <jrobinson at afilias.info>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>, Axel Pawlik (axel.pawlik at ripe.net) <axel.pawlik at ripe.net>, Byron Holland <byron.holland at cira.ca>, Diana Middleton <diana.middleton at icann.org>, Sally Costerton <sally.costerton at icann.org>, Icann-board ICANN <icann-board at icann.org>
>>
>> Thank you Theresa for sharing the transcript and recordings. 
>> Very helpful that this is shared immediately after the meeting. 
>>
>> I don't know if it is as issue with my environment but I wasn't able to confirm the recordings before Jonathan's talk ,i.e., no recordings of Andrew's talk.
>> (I will share this with our community, as I trust that any part of the recording which may be missing will be addressed, if this is not due to my environment, and I was able to confirm all discussions in the transcript)
>>
>> While this was a talk a not a presentation, I compiled my talk as slides to update the numbers community, so they can easily confirm major points of my talk.
>> I am planning to post this on the NRO website - If adequate, it is welcome to add the link to the slides, from the page you have posted with audio and transcript of the panel.
>> I will share it once they are posted on the NRO website for your reference.
>>
>>
>> Izumi
>>
>>
>> On 2015/04/27 10:55, Theresa Swinehart wrote:
>>> All -
>>>
>>> The audio and transcript are posted at: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/board-workshop-community-panel-intro-2015-04-26-en
>>>
>>> Thank you again for joining,
>>>
>>> Theresa
>>>
>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>>
>>> On Apr 26, 2015, at 08:50, Steve Crocker <steve at shinkuro.com<mailto:steve at shinkuro.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Izumi, Jari, Jonathan, Andrew and Axel,
>>>
>>> On behalf of the ICANN Board, let me add my thanks.  We appreciated your willingness to join us and to speak directly and frankly.  We listened closely and our subsequent discussions reflected the message we heard from all of you.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 25, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart at icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart at icann.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for joining for the panel discussion with the board,
>>> and for spending time on your weekend. Apologies again for the adjustments
>>> on time, will hopefully do better in the future, and appreciate your
>>> understanding and patience.
>>>
>>> The board found it to be a very useful discussion and appreciated having
>>> the opportunity. As soon as the recording is posted we'll get you the link
>>> and info.
>>>
>>> Thank you again,
>>>
>>> Theresa
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/25/15 10:18 AM, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp<mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Theresa,
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for the confirmation. It was extremely helpful that I received
>>> this confirmation swiftly before the panel.
>>> I had communicated this with the numbers community (which would need
>>> correction in case video is not shared but not a major issue).
>>>
>>> I would also like to thank ICANN and the Board for giving us the
>>> opportunity to share our perspectives.
>>>
>>> Jonathan,
>>> I hadn't gotten round to respond to you on the adobe chat but thank you
>>> for expressing your support for my idea on having a communication channel
>>> between the three operational communities.
>>> I appreciate that.
>>>
>>> Wish you all the nice rest of the weekend.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Izumi
>>>
>>> On 2015/04/25 3:18, Theresa Swinehart wrote:
>>> Hi Izumi,
>>>
>>> Yes, this panel session will be recorded and made available to the
>>> community, as soon as possible after the session. Please let the
>>> community
>>> know as well.
>>>
>>> All, thank you again for taking the time out of your Saturday's to join
>>> and looking forward to the session.
>>>
>>> Sally, who's moderating and copied here will share some thoughts on
>>> running the session later today.
>>>
>>> Do all have what they need on logistical information?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Theresa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/24/15 3:59 AM, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp<mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Theresa and all,
>>>
>>>
>>> May I confirm whether my understanding is correct that this discussions
>>> is to be video recorded and shared with the community?
>>> (There was a comment about this on the numbers community's mailing
>>> list)
>>>
>>> That was my assumption in accepting to join the panel, and apologies
>>> for
>>> comfirming such basic point at this timing just before the panel.
>>> I feel this is an important point to be clarify about though. Many
>>> thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Izumi Okutani
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2015/04/22 12:08, Theresa Swinehart wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the emails and suggestions. We thought it may be better
>>> to
>>> just have one panel, rather than try to have two. And having this
>>> panel
>>> focus on the range of topics already flagged on this list.
>>>
>>> We are looking at the time-slot of 8:30-10:00 AM US Pacific
>>> (15:30-17:00
>>> UTC). The IT team is looking at the logistics, but video connection
>>> should
>>> work whether Skype or other. More on that shortly.
>>>
>>> Michelle, can you send out the calendar invite?
>>>
>>> On topics, those provided in Izumi's note and Jari's points are good -
>>> capturing them here -
>>> - jurisdiction,
>>> - impact of postponing submission date to the NTIA,
>>> - ICANN-IANA function operator superagility, etc.
>>>
>>> - mismatch between traditional bargaining politics in the cabinets and
>>> open
>>> community processes.
>>>
>>> To Izumi's question - as the operational community proposals are
>>> understood, seems this is an opportunity for short overview of key
>>> elements, but more time on themes relevant to moving to the next phase
>>> of
>>> the transition.
>>>
>>> I've added Sally onto this exchange as she's kindly agreed to moderate
>>> the
>>> panel.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Theresa
>>>
>>> On 4/21/15 2:40 PM, "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko at piuha.net<mailto:jari.arkko at piuha.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought Izumi���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������s questions were good. FWIW, I think one
>>> of the political issues that we should consider is the mismatch
>>> between traditional bargaining politics in the cabinets and open
>>> community processes. Once you have gone open, it is difficult
>>> to come back��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� nor should we.
>>>
>>> Jari
>>>
>>> On 20 Apr 2015, at 12:59, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp<mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Steve,
>>>
>>>
>>> Assuming for now that both panel 3 and 4 will be covered by the same
>>> members, I have some questions on the topic for the panel
>>> discussions.
>>>
>>> Is there a particular aspect(s) of the political issues you have in
>>> mind to cover for Panel 3?
>>> e.g. jurisdiction, impact of postponing submission date to the NTIA,
>>> ICANN-IANA function operator superagility, etc.
>>>
>>> I have a similar question for Panel 4 - whether there is a
>>> particular
>>> point(s) ICANN Board would like to focus on the community panel, or
>>> it
>>> is expected for each community to share the current status (which is
>>> no
>>> change in the proposal for the numbers, working on implementation).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Izumi
>>>
>>> On 2015/04/17 21:04, Theresa Swinehart wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> To follow-on on Steve's note, thank you for your quick responses
>>> back,
>>> and
>>> for joining! We'll follow-up shortly on additional logistical
>>> information on
>>> video connection/IT approach to the session. I'll also follow-up
>>> with
>>> any
>>> other preparations.
>>>
>>> Vinciane, Michelle, please have a calendar invite sent out to this
>>> group for
>>> the suggested time slot for the 25th.
>>>
>>> Thanks all ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Theresa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From:  Byron Holland <byron.holland at cira.ca<mailto:byron.holland at cira.ca>>
>>> Date:  Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:17 PM
>>> To:  "steve at shinkuro.com<mailto:steve at shinkuro.com>" <steve at shinkuro.com<mailto:steve at shinkuro.com>>, Jari Arkko
>>> <jari.arkko at piuha.net<mailto:jari.arkko at piuha.net>>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com<mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>>,
>>> Axel
>>> Pawlik <axel.pawlik at ripe.net<mailto:axel.pawlik at ripe.net>>, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp<mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>>,
>>> "<jrobinson at afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>>" <jrobinson at afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>>
>>> Cc:  "steve at shinkuro.com<mailto:steve at shinkuro.com>" <steve at shinkuro.com<mailto:steve at shinkuro.com>>, Vinciane
>>> Koenigsfeld
>>> <vinciane.koenigsfeld at icann.org<mailto:vinciane.koenigsfeld at icann.org>>, Michelle Bright
>>> <michelle.bright at icann.org<mailto:michelle.bright at icann.org>>, Theresa Swinehart
>>> <theresa.swinehart at icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart at icann.org>>
>>> Subject:  Re: Invitation to a panel discussion with the ICANN Board
>>> on
>>> 25
>>> April
>>>
>>> Hi Steve
>>>
>>> I could make it and am flexible in the time slot you have provided.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Byron
>>>
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the TELUS network.
>>> From: Steve Crocker
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 2:10 PM
>>> To: Jari Arkko; Andrew Sullivan; Axel Pawlik
>>> (axel.pawlik at ripe.net<mailto:axel.pawlik at ripe.net>);
>>> izumi at nic.ad.jp<mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>; Byron Holland; <jrobinson at afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info>>
>>> Cc: Stephen D. Crocker; Vinciane Koenigsfeld; Michelle Bright;
>>> Theresa
>>> Swinehart
>>> Subject: Invitation to a panel discussion with the ICANN Board on
>>> 25
>>> April
>>>
>>> Jari, Andrew, Axel, Izumi, Byron, Jonathan,
>>>
>>> I hope this note finds you well.  I want  to invite you to join us
>>> for
>>> a
>>> video panel and brainstorming session during our upcoming ICANN
>>> Board
>>> Workshop on Saturday, April 25.  The subject is, of course, IANA
>>> Stewardship
>>> Transition.  For this session we'd like to have 2 moderated video
>>> panels to
>>> discuss and share views on both the political and community themes
>>> around
>>> the transition, with the following agenda:
>>> 1. Opening (Steve Crocker)
>>> 2. Overview of the transition
>>> 3. Panel to discuss the political issues around the transition
>>> 4. Panel of leadership representation from the IETF/IAB, RIR/CRISP,
>>> CCNSO
>>> and GNSO
>>> 5. Discussion (all)
>>> The panel addressing political issues would be encouraged to stay
>>> for
>>> the
>>> community panel, and likewise the community panel is invited to
>>> participate
>>> in the discussions following the political panel.
>>>
>>> The timing on the 25th would be a 1 hour window between 1530 UTC
>>> -1730
>>> UTC
>>> (8.30���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������10.30 US Pacific time). We have some flexibility to
>>> adjust
>>> the
>>> time if
>>> needed to accommodate panelist schedules.
>>>
>>> Would you be available to join for this session?  We'd welcome an
>>> open
>>> dialogue to share views, and thoughts.
>>>
>>> Please let us know if there's a period in the window of 1530
>>> ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1730
>>> UTC that
>>> works better for you, and we'll aim to adjust the schedule
>>> accordingly.
>>>
>>> Best regards and thanks,
>>>
>>> Steve Crocker
>>> Chairman, ICANN Board
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <ICANN Board community panel.pdf>_______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> 
> 