[CRISP-TEAM] Draft agenda for the 18th CRISP Call

Fri Apr 24 15:04:59 CEST 2015

Hi to All,
Could someone provides me a link to access to the meeting ?

/Janvier

2015-04-24 12:51 GMT+01:00 Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>:

> CRISP Team,
>
>
>
> Prior to the call today, this is some additional information per each
> agenda item.
> The pdf version is the same in contents.
>
>
> > 3.  Action Items
> >     a. Minutes from the last call
>
>  Circulated within the CRISP Team.
>  Waiting to be published on the website.
>
> >     b. Share future steps with the community
>
>  Done. https://www.nro.net/pipermail/ianaxfer/2015-April/000433.html
>
> >     c. Confirm about IPR and the IETF Trust with the IETF
>
>  Follow up e-mail sent by Izumi. No response from the IETF.
>
> >     d. Arrange a call with CWG-Stewardship Chairs
>
>  Request made by Izumi, waiting for CWG-Stewardship Chairs to share the
> availability.
>  The CWG-Names proposal is out now, so need to reconsider what we request
> for.
>
> >     e. Doodle poll on future call schedule (have some regularity)
>
>  Done. Waiting for the candidates to be fixed.
>
> > 4.  Confirm community feedback
> >     a. ARIN35
> >     b. Other RIR regions
> >     c. Global list
>
>  Request has been made to share SLA Text. A comment made about 7f.
>  https://www.nro.net/pipermail/ianaxfer/2015-April/000448.html
>
>  Would anyone from RIRs please be able to share the latest status on the
> ianaxfer at nro.net list?
>  I don't want to give the wrong impression that RIRs are holding something
> up and not transparent.
>
>
> > 5.  Update on GAO interview
>
>  GAO has been asked by the Chairs of the House Energy and Commerce
> Committee and its Communications and Technology Subcommittee to review the
> NTIA's planned transition.
>
>  Nurani and I joined the interview, based on the questions circulated on
> the CRISP Team mailing list.
>  There were two additional questions are reported on the CRISP Team ML:
> https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-April/001785.html
>
>  Based on the interview and to have identified additional information
> needed, Nurani and I will share the updated written response with the CRISP
> Team before submimission.
>  Suggest sharing the response with the numbers community. (I observe
> support from John, Michael, Andrei)
>
> > 6.  Update on the call with NRO EC
> >     a. Overview: What was confirmed, follow up items
> >     b. The role (if any) of the CRISP Team in community consultation
> >     c. The role (if any) of the CRISP Team in NRO website of discussions
> at RIR meetings
>
>  a. https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/2015-April/001774.html
>  b. The process should be lead by the RIRs. The CRISP Team give
> observation on whether community input is inline with the intention of the
> proposal.
>  c. My suggestion:
>     The draft report can be developed by RIR staff, but before publishing
> it, the CRISP Team members from that region (and any other member who
> atteded the meeting) reviews it.
>     It will then be endorsed by the NRO EC. This should be shared on the
> regional and global MLs.
>
>     In parallel, it would be desirable to share broader discussions on the
> IANA stewardship transition which took place at the RIR meetings, not just
> on SLA realtime as possible on the global regional MLs.
>     Therefore, make sure to post before each RIR meetings on the global
> MLs, and may be good to have a quick unofficial update of the general
> discussions at the meeting on IANA from a CRISP Team member from that
> region.
>
> > 7.  Preparation for ICANN Board panel
> >     a. Jurisdiction
> >     b. Country of the IANA function operator
> >     c. Implications for delay in submission of the proposal
> >     d. Ability for RIR community to chose the IANA operator
> >     e. IPR
> >     f. Gap between traditional negotiations and open community process
>
>  Draft ideas:
>  (As a starting point of consulting at the CRISP Team call)
>
>  a. Do we have an opinion this more than the discussions we have had?
>     (It should be fair to all parties involved in the IANA Numbering
> services)
>
>  b. Country of the IANA function operator
>     No need to change.
>     As seperate topic thereare some discussions in ICANN Accountabilty
> CCWG about incorporating in the Bylaws for ICANN to have its headquater in
> the US.
>
>  c. While NTIA states that there is no deadline, one could argue that
> ambiguity may increase on whether the proposal will be accepted.
>
>  d. This is a possibility, not concrete plan. We have clearly stated the
> numbers community is satisified with the current IANA operator(ICANN).
> However having this ability is important.
>
>  e. We consider the IETF Trust as an acceptable option. We are not saying
> this is the only option and open to coordination with the three operational
> communities.
>     It is important it will be lightweight and to be based on existing
> mechanisms as much as possible.
>
>  f. We would expect gaps but strong support for open community process.
> This is based on NTIA's requirements.
>
> Izumi
>
> On 2015/04/22 23:44, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> > CRISP Team,
> >
> >
> > Please see the draft agenda for the call on Fri 24th UTC13:00.
> > Feedback is welcome.
> >
> > As you can see we have quite a full agenda, so let's be efficient and I
> encourage the team to share updates online before the call as much as
> possible.
> >
> >
> > ---
> > 1. Agenda Review
> >
> > 2.  Update on the CRISP Team Composition
> >     a. Welcome new member: Janvier Ngnoulayea
> >
> > 3.  Action Items
> >     a. Minutes from the last call
> >     b. Share future steps with the community
> >     c. Confirm about IPR and the IETF Trust with the IETF
> >     d. Arrange a call with CWG-Stewardship Chairs
> >     e. Doodle poll on future call schedule (have some regularity)
> >
> > 4.  Confirm community feedback
> >     a. ARIN35
> >     b. Other RIR regions
> >     c. Global list
> >
> > 5.  Update on GAO interview
> >
> > 6.  Update on the call with NRO EC
> >     a. Overview: What was confirmed, follow up items
> >     b. The role (if any) of the CRISP Team in community consultation
> >     c. The role (if any) of the CRISP Team in NRO website of discussions
> at RIR meetings
> >
> > 7.  Preparation for ICANN Board panel
> >     a. Jurisdiction
> >     b. Country of the IANA function operator
> >     c. Implications for delay in submission of the proposal
> >     d. Ability for RIR community to chose the IANA operator
> >     e. IPR
> >     f. Gap between traditional negitiations and open community process
> >
> > 8.  Next Meeting
> >
> > 9.  AOB
> > ---
> >
> > Izumi
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CRISP mailing list
> > CRISP at nro.net
> > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150424/568bac6a/attachment.html>