[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Next Steps in the Process and the Community Engagement

Izumi Okutani izumi at nic.ad.jp
Mon Apr 13 07:15:45 CEST 2015


As a follow up on a related action item we had discussed at the CRISP Team calls, as you may recall, we have requested NRO EC to consider that RIRs to make a joint statement that RIRs acknowldege the numbers community proposal and will be preparing implementation based on this, with expected timeline for preparation for implementation (German to consult NRO EC).

I think this should come out early, not waiting for all coming RIR meetings.
Ofcourse, each RIR meetings can continue their consultation and dicussions with their respective communities based on this statement.

This is what we had agreed in the last two CRISP Team calls according to my understanding, but I thought it may be worth heighlighting this once again to ensure we share the same understsanding.
I welcome any other thoughts, comments if there are any.


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Next Steps in the Process and the Community Engagement
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:04:27 +0900
From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
To: ianaxfer at nro.net

On 2015/04/12 2:53, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> On Apr 11, 2015, at 4:40 AM, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>>>> - APNIC confirmed that the RIR would work on an SLA that is consistent with the numbers community proposal, to reflect the intention of the community.
>>> May i know why APNIC is the one making this confirmation? I understand APNIC is graciously serving as the secretariat for CRISP (hope that is still correct) and thank them for that, but i don't think their role should go beyound that. In summary, it will be preferred to get such confirmation from NRO-EC or from CRISP (but i think EC will be more appropriate in this context)
>> "The RIR" in the first quoted sentence refers specifically to APNIC.  So it's APNIC confirming that APNIC will work on an SLA that's consistent with the proposal.  Perhaps other RIRs will make similar confirmations in the near future.

John and Alan' comments are correct. This is refering to what APNIC intends to do as an RIR for the next steps.

> ARIN intends to make such a commitment in the public record at our meeting next Monday, and we hope that the other three RIRs will do so at their upcoming meetings as well.  We see this as a useful way of both engaging the attention of our membership to the transfer issues, and ratifying a transparency and accountability principle through a public commitment.

Thanks Bill for sharing this. A friendly reminder about the CRISP panel at ARIN35, which is open to remote participation as well.

 CRISP Panel   Monday, 13 April, 2015 11:00 AM  -  12:00 PM (UTC-7) 


ianaxfer mailing list
ianaxfer at nro.net

More information about the CRISP mailing list