[CRISP-TEAM] [Feedback] CRISP Team Statement: Our role and the next steps

[Nurani Nimpuno]

Yes, apologies if that wasn't clear.
I'm happy with Andrei's wording. 

Thanks and have a great weekend everyone!

Nurani



> On 10 apr 2015, at 17:43, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
> Nurani, 
> 
> I am curently assuming that your concern is resolved after I have reflected Andrei's suggested wording.
> I will wait for another 1 hour before sending it out so let me know if you have further comments before this. Thanks!
> 
> Izumi
> 
>> On 2015/04/10 22:08, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>> 
>>> On 10 apr 2015, at 09:51, Andrei Robachevsky <robachevsky at isoc.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thank you very much, Izumi, for your response.
>>> 
>>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 10/04/15 07:31:
>>> [...]
>>> 
>>>>       Therefore, in case there are any concerns for implementation to
>>>> be consistent with the numbers community proposal, including reflecting
>>>> the seperability of the IANA Numbering Services operator, it should be
>>>> communicated to the
>>>>       community's attention in a transparent manner.
>>> 
>>> I suggest a slight modification:
>>> 
>>> "Therefore, in case there are any concerns regarding consistency of the
>>> implementation with the numbers community proposal, ..."
>>> 
>>> I have a little discomfort with the "separability" term, although I
>>> understand it has become part of the IANA lingua franca.
>> 
>> I agree. I've held back responding, simply because I didn't have better wording to propose, but I agree with Andrei's general point(s).
>> 
>> (Both on the term "separability", and the general point about being clear on what feedback we are seeking from the community.)
>> 
>> 
>>> Cannot we
>>> simply say (for instance in your first point):
>>> 
>>> - The ability to choose an operator for the IANA numbering services is
>>> seen as one of the most important elements in ensuring the
>>> accountability of the IANA numbering function operator.
>>> 
>>> and continue using this throughout our communication?
>>> 
>>> This will mitigate a possible perception that we definitely want to
>>> separate these services from ICANN, which is not the case, I believe.
>> 
>> I'm happy with this wording. Thanks Andrei!
>> Nurani
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Andrei
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>