[CRISP-TEAM] CRISP Proposal FAQ
Alan Barrett
apb at cequrux.com
Wed Apr 8 13:01:07 CEST 2015
I have yet another late suggesiton for the FAQ.
Suggested new question:
In section II.B.2, the propoal says that a decision by the
NTIA to discontinue its stewardship would "have no significant
impact on the continuity of IANA Numbering Services", but it
would "remove a significant element of oversight". This seems
contradictory.
Suggested answer:
One statement refers to operations, and the other statement
refers to oversight, so there is no contradiction.
Where the proposal says "would have no significant impact on
the continuity of IANA Numbering Services currently provided
by ICANN", it's talking about operations. The NTIA has no
operational role whatsoever: number resource requests from the
RIRs to the IANA are not approved by the NTIA, or even seen
by the NTIA before the results are published. Removal of the
NTIA's stewardship will have no impact on operations of the
IANA Numbering Services, because the NTIA plays no role in
operations.
Where the proposal says "would remove a significant element of
oversight", it's referring to the NTIA's oversight role, which
is the ability to monitor performance and to terminate or renew
the contract.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP
mailing list