Alan Barrett apb at cequrux.com
Wed Apr 8 12:34:45 CEST 2015

On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, German Valdez wrote:
>May I request any comments for the second version of the FAQ document by this Wednesday COB

I know this is late, but I have just noticed a discrepancy in 
references to section numbers.

> What specifically is the "element of oversight" which is 
> referred to in section II.A, and how is it to be replaced under 
> this proposal?
> The element of oversight that the NTIA provides for the IANA 
> Numbering Services is the ability to change the contract with 
> ICANN.  This is stated in the very next paragraph of the CRISP 
> proposal (the last paragraph of section III.B.2), immediately 
> after the sentence that says "it would remove a significant 
> element of oversight". ICANN has historically provided IANA 
> Numbering Services via the IANA Number Registries under the 
> terms of the NTIA IANA Functions contract, and therefore IANA 
> Numbering Services for the RIRs are currently subject to change 
> in accordance with that agreement.

The reference to an "element of oversight" is in section II.B.2, 
not in II.A (as it says in the question), and not in III.B.2 (as 
it says in the answer.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

More information about the CRISP mailing list