[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: RE: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related Functions

[Paul Rendek]

Hello All,

Yup, this all looks just fine.

Cheers,
Paul

On 4/7/15 9:41 AM, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> Sounds like a good plan to me, Izumi.
>
> Andrei
>
> Izumi Okutani wrote on 06/04/15 12:22:
>> The CRISP Team,
>>
>>
>> I'd like to share the response from the CWG-Stewardship Co-Chairs for the Names.
>>
>> They suggests a teleconference among the chairs this time, i.e., Jonathan, Lise, Alan and myself.
>>
>> This sounds like a pragmatic suggestion to me at this stage. I will send back a quick ack saying I will consult with the CRISP Team.
>>
>> Below is my draft suggestion on how we respond:
>>
>>  - Thank them for the time and consideration, happy to accept the suggestion
>>
>>  - As Alan will no longer be a member of the CRISP Team, we suggest a date after we elect Vice-Chair
>>
>>  - Suggest to invite ICG representatives from the names and the numbers
>>    (their attendance is not a must but allow them to join if they wish)
>>
>>  - Suggest this not to be just one time: request Co-Chairs of CWG-Stewardship for update when there are concrete discussions related to the numbers community/our proposal
>>    (and hear any other suggestions they may have)
>>
>>  - Do the same from our side, to receive feedback at early stage
>>    IPR issue: something we already raised in Singapore and they are aware
>>    In addition, the option of changing the IANA operator from ICANN, FAQ & Slides in development
>>
>>  - Myself and Vice-Chair will report the CRISP Team on key updates. 
>>    We consult our respective communities on anything which needs decisions.
>>
>>
>> I welcome your feedback online and let's discuss it in the CRISP Team call this week as well.
>>
>>
>> Izumi
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: RE: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related Functions
>> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:57:04 +0100
>> From: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>> Reply-To: jrobinson at afilias.info
>> Organization: Afilias
>> To: 'Izumi Okutani' <izumi at nic.ad.jp>, 'Lise Fuhr' <lise.fuhr at difo.dk>
>> CC: 'Alan Barrett' <apb at cequrux.com>
>>
>> Dear Izumi,
>>
>>  
>>
>> Thank-you for this letter and for the brief follow-up discussion in person
>> in Istanbul.  
>>
>>  
>>
>> The CWG-Stewardship meeting in Istanbul was comprehensive and productive.
>> Lise and I chose to wait until after this meeting to respond to your note
>> because we wanted to share with you the outcome of this meeting. In our
>> Chairs' Statement <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-03-29-en> ,
>> you will see that the group made significant progress on both the
>> operational and structural components of the names proposal, through the
>> Design Team working methodology and retention of independent legal
>> counsellors. 
>>
>>  
>>
>> In terms of our timeline, we have moved our public comment launch date to 20
>> April, with a final submission to the ICG anticipated for the ICANN 53
>> meeting in Buenos Aires. We have adjusted our timeline per request by our
>> chartering organizations in order that they have enough time to ensure
>> consensus support for the names proposal within their respective communities
>> and using their specific processes. 
>>
>>  
>>
>> We recognize your concerns regarding the possibility that our proposal might
>> affect the numbers community and we are very open to discussions with you
>> and the CRISP team in advance of our submission to ICG. However, we have not
>> yet finalized a proposal and our legal advisors are working with us to
>> analyse the implications of the so called internal model. Therefore, our
>> suggestion at this stage is to have a call with you and Alan to give an
>> overview of where we are and consider any possible implications for the
>> numbering community. 
>>
>>  
>>
>> We remain available to respond to any questions you or your community may
>> have, and appreciate your interest in and support for the names community as
>> we all work to achieve a successful IANA Stewardship Transition. 
>>
>>  
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>> Jonathan and Lise
>>
>> CWG-Stewardship Co-Chairs
>>
>>  
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Izumi Okutani [mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp] 
>> Sent: 22 March 2015 04:58
>> To: Jonathan Robinson; Lise Fuhr
>> Cc: Alan Barrett
>> Subject: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related
>> Functions
>>
>>  
>>
>> Dear Jonathan and Lise,
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>> I am writing to you as Chair of the Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship
>> Proposal (CRISP) team, responsible for preparation of the numbers
>> community's response to the ICG's Request for Proposals.
>>
>>  
>>
>> It was helpful to have the update on the CWG for Naming Related Functions
>> progress at the session in Singapore, including the revised timeline of the
>> process proposed by the CWG-Names, with a CWG-Names proposal submission in
>> June later this year. This revised timeline increases the need for
>> collaborative and constructive work in the ICG as well as between all three
>> stakeholder communities to progress efficiently with the timeline. We remain
>> positive that a proposal satisfactory to all parties, can be produced
>> through this process.
>>
>>  
>>
>> The ICG's decision to seek proposals from the three separate affected
>> communities reflects the distinct needs, mechanisms and historical
>> development of these three communities. At the same time, developing a
>> proposal that satisfactorily addresses stewardship of all the IANA functions
>> is a priority for all parties.
>>
>>  
>>
>> With this in mind, I would like to request that the Chairs of the CWG-Names
>> communicate directly to the Chair and Vice-Chair of the CRISP team,
>> regarding any proposals or developments that might affect the numbers
>> community in advance, and not wait for the final submission to the ICG.
>>
>>  
>>
>> This level of direct communication and collaboration will allow all
>> communities to consider the impact and potential compatibility issues among
>> the proposals ahead of the ICG consolidation process, consult appropriately
>> within their communities, and, if necessary, develop appropriate responses
>> efficiently, rather than wait for inputs from the numbers community after
>> the ICG consolidates proposal from all the operational communities. Such
>> bottom-up consideration by all communities will be essential to the
>> authority and success of any final proposal to the NTIA.
>>
>>  
>>
>> I look forward to hearing of your continued progress, and to work
>> collaboratively with you to achieve a successful outcome for all, of the
>> IANA Stewardship transition.
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>  
>>
>> Izumi Okutani, Alan Barrett
>>
>> CRISP Team Chair, Vice-Chair
>>
>> ___________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>