[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: RE: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related Functions

Tue Apr 7 10:41:42 CEST 2015

Sounds like a good plan to me, Izumi.

Andrei

Izumi Okutani wrote on 06/04/15 12:22:
> The CRISP Team,
> 
> 
> I'd like to share the response from the CWG-Stewardship Co-Chairs for the Names.
> 
> They suggests a teleconference among the chairs this time, i.e., Jonathan, Lise, Alan and myself.
> 
> This sounds like a pragmatic suggestion to me at this stage. I will send back a quick ack saying I will consult with the CRISP Team.
>
> Below is my draft suggestion on how we respond:
> 
>  - Thank them for the time and consideration, happy to accept the suggestion
> 
>  - As Alan will no longer be a member of the CRISP Team, we suggest a date after we elect Vice-Chair
> 
>  - Suggest to invite ICG representatives from the names and the numbers
>    (their attendance is not a must but allow them to join if they wish)
> 
>  - Suggest this not to be just one time: request Co-Chairs of CWG-Stewardship for update when there are concrete discussions related to the numbers community/our proposal
>    (and hear any other suggestions they may have)
> 
>  - Do the same from our side, to receive feedback at early stage
>    IPR issue: something we already raised in Singapore and they are aware
>    In addition, the option of changing the IANA operator from ICANN, FAQ & Slides in development
> 
>  - Myself and Vice-Chair will report the CRISP Team on key updates. 
>    We consult our respective communities on anything which needs decisions.
> 
> 
> I welcome your feedback online and let's discuss it in the CRISP Team call this week as well.
> 
> 
> Izumi
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: RE: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related Functions
> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:57:04 +0100
> From: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
> Reply-To: jrobinson at afilias.info
> Organization: Afilias
> To: 'Izumi Okutani' <izumi at nic.ad.jp>, 'Lise Fuhr' <lise.fuhr at difo.dk>
> CC: 'Alan Barrett' <apb at cequrux.com>
> 
> Dear Izumi,
> 
>  
> 
> Thank-you for this letter and for the brief follow-up discussion in person
> in Istanbul.  
> 
>  
> 
> The CWG-Stewardship meeting in Istanbul was comprehensive and productive.
> Lise and I chose to wait until after this meeting to respond to your note
> because we wanted to share with you the outcome of this meeting. In our
> Chairs' Statement <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-03-29-en> ,
> you will see that the group made significant progress on both the
> operational and structural components of the names proposal, through the
> Design Team working methodology and retention of independent legal
> counsellors. 
> 
>  
> 
> In terms of our timeline, we have moved our public comment launch date to 20
> April, with a final submission to the ICG anticipated for the ICANN 53
> meeting in Buenos Aires. We have adjusted our timeline per request by our
> chartering organizations in order that they have enough time to ensure
> consensus support for the names proposal within their respective communities
> and using their specific processes. 
> 
>  
> 
> We recognize your concerns regarding the possibility that our proposal might
> affect the numbers community and we are very open to discussions with you
> and the CRISP team in advance of our submission to ICG. However, we have not
> yet finalized a proposal and our legal advisors are working with us to
> analyse the implications of the so called internal model. Therefore, our
> suggestion at this stage is to have a call with you and Alan to give an
> overview of where we are and consider any possible implications for the
> numbering community. 
> 
>  
> 
> We remain available to respond to any questions you or your community may
> have, and appreciate your interest in and support for the names community as
> we all work to achieve a successful IANA Stewardship Transition. 
> 
>  
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Jonathan and Lise
> 
> CWG-Stewardship Co-Chairs
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Izumi Okutani [mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp] 
> Sent: 22 March 2015 04:58
> To: Jonathan Robinson; Lise Fuhr
> Cc: Alan Barrett
> Subject: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related
> Functions
> 
>  
> 
> Dear Jonathan and Lise,
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> I am writing to you as Chair of the Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship
> Proposal (CRISP) team, responsible for preparation of the numbers
> community's response to the ICG's Request for Proposals.
> 
>  
> 
> It was helpful to have the update on the CWG for Naming Related Functions
> progress at the session in Singapore, including the revised timeline of the
> process proposed by the CWG-Names, with a CWG-Names proposal submission in
> June later this year. This revised timeline increases the need for
> collaborative and constructive work in the ICG as well as between all three
> stakeholder communities to progress efficiently with the timeline. We remain
> positive that a proposal satisfactory to all parties, can be produced
> through this process.
> 
>  
> 
> The ICG's decision to seek proposals from the three separate affected
> communities reflects the distinct needs, mechanisms and historical
> development of these three communities. At the same time, developing a
> proposal that satisfactorily addresses stewardship of all the IANA functions
> is a priority for all parties.
> 
>  
> 
> With this in mind, I would like to request that the Chairs of the CWG-Names
> communicate directly to the Chair and Vice-Chair of the CRISP team,
> regarding any proposals or developments that might affect the numbers
> community in advance, and not wait for the final submission to the ICG.
> 
>  
> 
> This level of direct communication and collaboration will allow all
> communities to consider the impact and potential compatibility issues among
> the proposals ahead of the ICG consolidation process, consult appropriately
> within their communities, and, if necessary, develop appropriate responses
> efficiently, rather than wait for inputs from the numbers community after
> the ICG consolidates proposal from all the operational communities. Such
> bottom-up consideration by all communities will be essential to the
> authority and success of any final proposal to the NTIA.
> 
>  
> 
> I look forward to hearing of your continued progress, and to work
> collaboratively with you to achieve a successful outcome for all, of the
> IANA Stewardship transition.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Izumi Okutani, Alan Barrett
> 
> CRISP Team Chair, Vice-Chair
> 
> ___________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> 