[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: RE: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related Functions

[Sweeting, John]

Sounds like a good plan.

On 4/6/15, 6:22 AM, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

>The CRISP Team,
>
>
>I'd like to share the response from the CWG-Stewardship Co-Chairs for the
>Names.
>
>They suggests a teleconference among the chairs this time, i.e.,
>Jonathan, Lise, Alan and myself.
>
>This sounds like a pragmatic suggestion to me at this stage. I will send
>back a quick ack saying I will consult with the CRISP Team.
>
>Below is my draft suggestion on how we respond:
>
> - Thank them for the time and consideration, happy to accept the
>suggestion
>
> - As Alan will no longer be a member of the CRISP Team, we suggest a
>date after we elect Vice-Chair
>
> - Suggest to invite ICG representatives from the names and the numbers
>   (their attendance is not a must but allow them to join if they wish)
>
> - Suggest this not to be just one time: request Co-Chairs of
>CWG-Stewardship for update when there are concrete discussions related to
>the numbers community/our proposal
>   (and hear any other suggestions they may have)
>
> - Do the same from our side, to receive feedback at early stage
>   IPR issue: something we already raised in Singapore and they are aware
>   In addition, the option of changing the IANA operator from ICANN, FAQ
>& Slides in development
>
> - Myself and Vice-Chair will report the CRISP Team on key updates.
>   We consult our respective communities on anything which needs
>decisions.
>
>
>I welcome your feedback online and let's discuss it in the CRISP Team
>call this week as well.
>
>
>Izumi
>
>
>
>-------- Forwarded Message --------
>Subject: RE: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming
>Related Functions
>Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:57:04 +0100
>From: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>Reply-To: jrobinson at afilias.info
>Organization: Afilias
>To: 'Izumi Okutani' <izumi at nic.ad.jp>, 'Lise Fuhr' <lise.fuhr at difo.dk>
>CC: 'Alan Barrett' <apb at cequrux.com>
>
>Dear Izumi,
>
>
>
>Thank-you for this letter and for the brief follow-up discussion in person
>in Istanbul.
>
>
>
>The CWG-Stewardship meeting in Istanbul was comprehensive and productive.
>Lise and I chose to wait until after this meeting to respond to your note
>because we wanted to share with you the outcome of this meeting. In our
>Chairs' Statement <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-03-29-en>
>,
>you will see that the group made significant progress on both the
>operational and structural components of the names proposal, through the
>Design Team working methodology and retention of independent legal
>counsellors.
>
>
>
>In terms of our timeline, we have moved our public comment launch date to
>20
>April, with a final submission to the ICG anticipated for the ICANN 53
>meeting in Buenos Aires. We have adjusted our timeline per request by our
>chartering organizations in order that they have enough time to ensure
>consensus support for the names proposal within their respective
>communities
>and using their specific processes.
>
>
>
>We recognize your concerns regarding the possibility that our proposal
>might
>affect the numbers community and we are very open to discussions with you
>and the CRISP team in advance of our submission to ICG. However, we have
>not
>yet finalized a proposal and our legal advisors are working with us to
>analyse the implications of the so called internal model. Therefore, our
>suggestion at this stage is to have a call with you and Alan to give an
>overview of where we are and consider any possible implications for the
>numbering community.
>
>
>
>We remain available to respond to any questions you or your community may
>have, and appreciate your interest in and support for the names community
>as
>we all work to achieve a successful IANA Stewardship Transition.
>
>
>
>Best wishes,
>
>
>
>
>
>Jonathan and Lise
>
>CWG-Stewardship Co-Chairs
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Izumi Okutani [mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp]
>Sent: 22 March 2015 04:58
>To: Jonathan Robinson; Lise Fuhr
>Cc: Alan Barrett
>Subject: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related
>Functions
>
>
>
>Dear Jonathan and Lise,
>
>
>
>
>
>I am writing to you as Chair of the Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship
>Proposal (CRISP) team, responsible for preparation of the numbers
>community's response to the ICG's Request for Proposals.
>
>
>
>It was helpful to have the update on the CWG for Naming Related Functions
>progress at the session in Singapore, including the revised timeline of
>the
>process proposed by the CWG-Names, with a CWG-Names proposal submission in
>June later this year. This revised timeline increases the need for
>collaborative and constructive work in the ICG as well as between all
>three
>stakeholder communities to progress efficiently with the timeline. We
>remain
>positive that a proposal satisfactory to all parties, can be produced
>through this process.
>
>
>
>The ICG's decision to seek proposals from the three separate affected
>communities reflects the distinct needs, mechanisms and historical
>development of these three communities. At the same time, developing a
>proposal that satisfactorily addresses stewardship of all the IANA
>functions
>is a priority for all parties.
>
>
>
>With this in mind, I would like to request that the Chairs of the
>CWG-Names
>communicate directly to the Chair and Vice-Chair of the CRISP team,
>regarding any proposals or developments that might affect the numbers
>community in advance, and not wait for the final submission to the ICG.
>
>
>
>This level of direct communication and collaboration will allow all
>communities to consider the impact and potential compatibility issues
>among
>the proposals ahead of the ICG consolidation process, consult
>appropriately
>within their communities, and, if necessary, develop appropriate responses
>efficiently, rather than wait for inputs from the numbers community after
>the ICG consolidates proposal from all the operational communities. Such
>bottom-up consideration by all communities will be essential to the
>authority and success of any final proposal to the NTIA.
>
>
>
>I look forward to hearing of your continued progress, and to work
>collaboratively with you to achieve a successful outcome for all, of the
>IANA Stewardship transition.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Kind regards,
>
>
>
>Izumi Okutani, Alan Barrett
>
>CRISP Team Chair, Vice-Chair
>
>___________________
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CRISP mailing list
>CRISP at nro.net
>https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp


This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.