[CRISP-TEAM] [draft] NRO-NC role in Review Committee

[Izumi Okutani]

Thank you Alan for the draft, and Andres & Mwnedwa for the feedback.

I see Andres is agreement with the draft by Alan.

Mwendwa, I note you think we should have a line to describe how the 
Review Committee shall be constituted.

To undertand your point more accurately, would you help me clarify 
whether it's sufficient to state the Review Team should be appointed by 
the 5 RIR communities, or you have something more in mind?


Thanks,
Izumi


On 2014/12/31 2:13, Mwendwa Kivuva wrote:
> On the response, we should also have a line on how the review committee
> shall be constituted. I am sure the community will also raise that if we
> don't address it in our response.
>
> On Tuesday, 30 December 2014, Sweeting, John <john.sweeting at twcable.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On 12/30/14, 9:15 AM, "Andres Piazza" <andres at lacnic.net <javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Alan,
>>>
>>> I agree 100% with that answer. You can also add that the members of the
>>> Review Commitee should be appointed by the 5 communities and the final
>>> report should be considered as advice received by NRO-EC.
>>>
>>> I believe it is important to stand out that the RIRs are eventually
>>> (NRO) the ones performing oversight (trought contract with IANA
>>> operator) but having the imput of a Independent Review Committee.
>>>
>>> A.
>>>
>>> El 29/12/14 a las 18:34, Alan Barrett escribi�:
>>>> I volunteered to draft a response about this issue. The
>>>> following text is my proposal for an answer we can give to the
>>>> community.
>>>>
>>>> [[[
>>>> Subject: NRO-NC role in Review Committee
>>>>
>>>> There has been a suggestion that the work of the "Review Committee"
>>>> proposed in the CRISP draft should be handled by the NRO-NC, or
>>>> alternatively, that the chair of the NRO-NC should be co-opted to
>>>> serve on the Review Committee.
>>>>
>>>> The CRISP Team believes that is would be wise to to keep the
>>>> operational performance review process independent of the policy
>>>> development process.  Because the NRO-NC (or ASO-AC) has a role in
>>>> global policy development, we think that the proposed Review Committee
>>>> should be independent of the NRO-NC.
>>>>
>>>> ]]]
>>>>
>>>> --apb (Alan Barrett)
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>> CRISP at nro.net <javascript:;>
>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net <javascript:;>
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>>
>> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
>> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
>> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely
>> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you
>> are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that
>> any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to
>> the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and
>> may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify
>> the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of
>> this E-mail and any printout.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net <javascript:;>
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>