[CRISP-TEAM] [draft] NRO-NC role in Review Committee
andres at lacnic.net
Tue Dec 30 15:15:01 CET 2014
I agree 100% with that answer. You can also add that the members of the
Review Commitee should be appointed by the 5 communities and the final
report should be considered as advice received by NRO-EC.
I believe it is important to stand out that the RIRs are eventually
(NRO) the ones performing oversight (trought contract with IANA
operator) but having the imput of a Independent Review Committee.
El 29/12/14 a las 18:34, Alan Barrett escribió:
> I volunteered to draft a response about this issue. The
> following text is my proposal for an answer we can give to the
> Subject: NRO-NC role in Review Committee
> There has been a suggestion that the work of the "Review Committee"
> proposed in the CRISP draft should be handled by the NRO-NC, or
> alternatively, that the chair of the NRO-NC should be co-opted to
> serve on the Review Committee.
> The CRISP Team believes that is would be wise to to keep the
> operational performance review process independent of the policy
> development process. Because the NRO-NC (or ASO-AC) has a role in
> global policy development, we think that the proposed Review Committee
> should be independent of the NRO-NC.
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
More information about the CRISP