[CRISP-TEAM] Clarifying the possibility of deletation to another IANA operator Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] Comments on CRISP proposal

Izumi Okutani izumi at nic.ad.jp
Tue Dec 30 07:23:14 CET 2014

Thank you Alan. I saw your draft which proposes not to go into details
at this stage including stating the possiblity to delegating to another

Noted and welcome comments from CRISP Team on Alan's draft for "
Subject: Re: [CRISP-TEAM] [draft] ".


On 2014/12/30 15:10, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> Question to CRISP Team ;
>> Supposing we agree about to add clause in the contract about 
>> possibility of changing the IANA operator as termination clause, does 
>> it make sense to describe our general direction in the ICG proposal, 
>> as suggested?
>> (i.e, not to describe details of the clause to be put into the 
>> contract, but clarify our general direction in our proposal, to have 
>> the possibility of changing IANA operator incase the current operator 
>> doesn't meet the needs of RIRs and its communities)
> I have updated my draft of the response to contract issues, to address 
> this point.  See the message with Subject: Re: [CRISP-TEAM] [draft] 
> Contract details
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp

More information about the CRISP mailing list