[CRISP-TEAM] [NRO secretariat] Version control of the drafts

[German Valdez]

Hi 

I'd work better if I can have access tot the word versions. I cannot modified pdf documents so I can add the proposed version track.

I can only add signatures as text but it'd ruin the format. 

It's possible to have the word versions?

Cheers

German



> On 25 Dec 2014, at 3:41 pm, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
> CRISP Team,
> 
> 
> To seperate "meeting materials" and "official CRISP
> documents/information" on NRO website as suggested by Alan,
> I drafted an example.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * Draft proposal published by CRISP Team
> 
> Date         draft version   Description
> ----        -------------   ------------
> 2014/12/19  version 1.0     Initial draft developed by CRISP Team
> 2014/12/xx  version 1.1     Editorial changes from version 1.0
>                            (To describe answers in the same order as
>                             questions listed in each Section)
>                             No changes in contents of the draft.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * Latest CRISP Team Timeline
>  ## Link to the latest Timeline ##
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> We should have date, draft versions (with links to each) and describe
> major change(s) from the previous version. Anything else?
> 
> This is just one idea, and I'll leave the details to German including
> the format.
> 
> 
> German,
> We can revise and improve as needed, so please help us post the edited
> version shared by Michael (UTC12:49 12/24), in the format you think is
> the best at this stage. Thanks German.
> 
> 
> 
> Izumi
> 
> 
> (2014/12/24 18:55), Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> Andrei and all,
>> 
>>> And I think by that we meant including the version number in the title
>>> and the URL. I current practice is that the name of the file contains
>>> the date. It'd be also useful if we put the date in the document itself.
>> 
>> I agree it's useful to add the date as well.
>> Thank you for clarifying the details, of reflecting version number in
>> the title and the URL.
>> 
>> I hope this gives German a better idea and also hope this is not so hard
>> to implement - after holidays, please let us know if you have any issues
>> German.
>> 
>> Thanks also to Nurani for the feedback on the summary.
>> I'm happy to know my understanding is consistent with other members of
>> CRISP team - if anyone has other thoughts/comments, it's still welcome
>> ofcourse.
>> 
>> 
>> Izumi
>> 
>> (2014/12/24 15:56), Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>> This is an accurate summary Izumi, thank you.
>>> 
>>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 24/12/14 03:16:
>>>>    - Version control of each draft (like in the IETF)
>>> 
>>> And I think by that we meant including the version number in the title
>>> and the URL. I current practice is that the name of the file contains
>>> the date. It'd be also useful if we put the date in the document itself.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Andrei
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>