[CRISP-TEAM] Suggestion about change in global PDP

Izumi Okutani izumi at nic.ad.jp
Thu Dec 25 16:54:23 CET 2014


i suggest a minor update of section 10 of the gPDP as follow: In case
Step 9 (c), should at least *two* of the RIRs agree that changes need to
be made

My suggested response:
Changes in global PDP is out of the scope of ICG's RFP, hense CRISP
Team's work.

Suggest Seun to go through the standard process(i.e.,go through gPDP
process to propose the change in gPDP), if he would like to change this
part of global PDP.

Any other thoughts or approach?


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Internet Number Community IANA Stewardship
Proposal: First Draft
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 07:20:34 +0100
From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
To: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
CC: ianaxfer at nro.net <ianaxfer at nro.net>

Hello Izumi,

Thanks for the share, kindly find below a few comments/suggestions (first

- The entire first paragraph of section III should be deleted as it does
not add any more value to the response for that section

- I suggest replacing the word contract in section III with agreement and
this will also largely require re-wording of 3rd paragraph of section IV

- The agreement (currently referred to as contract) should not be termed
based as presumed to be indicated in section III but should have
termination conditions

- The Review committee may not necessarily be required as i believe the
role of ICANN is clear and the termination conditions will be largely tied
to the gPDP plus other technical operations efficiencies. In view of this,
i propose that the review of compliance to agreement terms be handled
mainly by the NRO-NC but in conjunction with NRO-EC.

However if there is more consensus towards establishing a review team i
will still be okay with it (although its extra cost) but will then strongly
suggest that the selection of the committee be done by the COMMUNITY. I
propose that the community of each RIR should elect a member while the
chair of the NRO-EC at any point in time will be co-opted to serve as the
review team (6 in total)

Finally on a related note, i suggest a minor update of section 10 of the
gPDP as follow:

In case Step 9 (c), should at least *two* of the RIRs agree that changes
need to be made



On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
> Please find the first draft of the Internet numbers community's response
> to the Request For Proposals issued by the IANA Stewardship Coordination
> Group (ICG). This draft has been prepared by the Consolidated RIR IANA
> Stewardship Proposal (CRISP) team, and we are now seeking feedback on
> this draft from the global community.
> The next CRISP team teleconference will be held on Monday 22 December at
> 13:00 UTC. Details on how to join as an observer will be posted to this
> list.
>  Draft proposal: https://www.nro.net/crisp-proposal-first-draft
>  The deadline for providing feedback: 5 January 2015
>  Feedback should be sent to         : <ianaxfer at nro.net> mailing list
>  Key points:
>   - ICANN to continue as an operator of the IANA function:
>   - Agreement: Exchange SLA with ICANN as the IANA function
>                operator on number resources
>   - Review Committee with representatives from each RIR region
>  Other notes about the draft:
>  The following will be reflected in the second draft.
>   - The first two sentences of the last paragraph in Section III
>    "Proposed Post-Transition Oversight and Accountability Arrangements"
>     is under consideration by CRISP Team to be deleted.
>   - In addition, CRISP Team continues work on editing, to have our
>     answers in the same order as questions listed in each section.
>  Key dates:
>    First draft published            : 19 Dec 2014
>    First draft comments close       :  5 Jan 2015
>    Second draft to be published     :  8 Jan 2015
>    Second draft comments close      : 12 Jan 2015
>    Final proposal to be sent to ICG : 15 Jan 2015
>  How to engage in discussions:
>   All global discussions, for CRISP team to consider as community
>   feedback, will be conducted at <ianaxfer at nro.net> mailing list.
>   All CRISP team discussions are open to observers.
> References:
> ------------
> * Discussions by CRISP Team
>     Details of all the CRISP team's work to date, including recordings,
>     minutes and agendas of all CRISP teleconferences and a public
>     archive of the internal CRISP team mailing list, are available at:
>     https://nro.net/crisp-team
> * Other links:
>   - ICG request for proposals:
>    <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2014-09-03-en>
>   - The IANA Stewardship Transition Discussion in each RIR region:
> <
> https://www.nro.net/nro-and-internet-governance/iana-oversight/timeline-for-rirs-engagement-in-iana-stewardship-transition-process
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ianaxfer mailing list
> ianaxfer at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer


*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

The key to understanding is humility - my view !

More information about the CRISP mailing list