[CRISP-TEAM] Version control of the drafts

[Izumi Okutani]

CRISP Team,


To seperate "meeting materials" and "official CRISP
documents/information" on NRO website as suggested by Alan,
I drafted an example.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Draft proposal published by CRISP Team

Date         draft version   Description
----        -------------   ------------
2014/12/19  version 1.0     Initial draft developed by CRISP Team
2014/12/xx  version 1.1     Editorial changes from version 1.0
                            (To describe answers in the same order as
                             questions listed in each Section)
                             No changes in contents of the draft.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Latest CRISP Team Timeline
  ## Link to the latest Timeline ##
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

We should have date, draft versions (with links to each) and describe
major change(s) from the previous version. Anything else?

This is just one idea, and I'll leave the details to German including
the format.


German,
We can revise and improve as needed, so please help us post the edited
version shared by Michael (UTC12:49 12/24), in the format you think is
the best at this stage. Thanks German.



Izumi


(2014/12/24 18:55), Izumi Okutani wrote:
> Andrei and all,
> 
>> And I think by that we meant including the version number in the title
>> and the URL. I current practice is that the name of the file contains
>> the date. It'd be also useful if we put the date in the document itself.
> 
> I agree it's useful to add the date as well.
> Thank you for clarifying the details, of reflecting version number in
> the title and the URL.
> 
> I hope this gives German a better idea and also hope this is not so hard
> to implement - after holidays, please let us know if you have any issues
> German.
> 
> Thanks also to Nurani for the feedback on the summary.
> I'm happy to know my understanding is consistent with other members of
> CRISP team - if anyone has other thoughts/comments, it's still welcome
> ofcourse.
> 
> 
> Izumi
> 
> (2014/12/24 15:56), Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>> This is an accurate summary Izumi, thank you.
>>
>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 24/12/14 03:16:
>>>     - Version control of each draft (like in the IETF)
>>
>> And I think by that we meant including the version number in the title
>> and the URL. I current practice is that the name of the file contains
>> the date. It'd be also useful if we put the date in the document itself.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Andrei
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>