[CRISP-TEAM] Section V NTIA Requirements Re: Updated proposal draft - reordering answers edit
nurani at netnod.se
Tue Dec 23 13:59:17 CET 2014
I agree with your comment Izumi. Let's look at how we can strengthen this section for the second draft.
> On 23 dec 2014, at 12:04, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> I wonder if we feel we have properly answered Section "V. NTIA Requirement".
> I feel this section is a little weak, even though it is very important we explain we meet the criteria set by NTIA.
> This is beyond editorial review, so let's leave it as it is when publishing edited version, but we should address it for the 2nd draft.
> What do you think, CRISP Team?
> (2014/12/23 5:13), Michael Abejuela wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>> Please find attached the updated proposal draft as discussed during the conference call earlier today. You will observe both a redline version highlighting the changes proposed by myself, Izumi and Alan. In addition, a clean version is attached for ease of review that includes minor formatting changes.
>> Please let me know if you have any questions. Izumi and Alan, I trust I was able to capture all of your edits but please review and let me know if I have missed any. I look forward to the team�s comments.
>> Michael R. Abejuela
>> Associate General Counsel
>> 3635 Concorde Parkway
>> Suite 200
>> Chantilly, VA 20151
>> (703) 227-9875 (p)
>> (703) 263-0111 (f)
>> mabejuela at arin.net<mailto:mabejuela at arin.net>
>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, copy, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
More information about the CRISP