[CRISP-TEAM] Review Committee

[Paul Rendek]

+1


On 12/22/14 12:47 PM, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> I agree with Alan. Policy development and the IANA service are two
> different areas that must not overlap.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrei
>
> Alan Barrett wrote on 22/12/14 13:27:
>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Mwendwa Kivuva wrote:
>>> I was of the view that we should give NRO NC the function of the review
>>> committee. The reasoning is:
>>> 1. No burden of constituting a different body. NRO NC is already
>>> established.
>>> 2. NRO NC is representative of all RIRs and established in ICANN as
>>> ASO AC
>>> 3. The burden of review committee is minimal and can be a running Agenda
>>> item in ASO AC regular meetings.
>> I prefer to keep them separate.  The NRO-NC/ASO-AC is involved with
>> policy development, but the Review Committee would be involved in
>> monitoring the performance after policy is ratified.  These are very
>> different roles.
>>
>> --apb (Alan Barrett)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>