[CRISP-TEAM] Review Committee

Andrei Robachevsky robachevsky at isoc.org
Mon Dec 22 13:47:48 CET 2014

I agree with Alan. Policy development and the IANA service are two
different areas that must not overlap.



Alan Barrett wrote on 22/12/14 13:27:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Mwendwa Kivuva wrote:
>> I was of the view that we should give NRO NC the function of the review
>> committee. The reasoning is:
>> 1. No burden of constituting a different body. NRO NC is already
>> established.
>> 2. NRO NC is representative of all RIRs and established in ICANN as
>> 3. The burden of review committee is minimal and can be a running Agenda
>> item in ASO AC regular meetings.
> I prefer to keep them separate.  The NRO-NC/ASO-AC is involved with
> policy development, but the Review Committee would be involved in
> monitoring the performance after policy is ratified.  These are very
> different roles.
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp

More information about the CRISP mailing list