[CRISP-TEAM] Review Committee

Alan Barrett apb at cequrux.com
Mon Dec 22 13:27:25 CET 2014

On Mon, 22 Dec 2014, Mwendwa Kivuva wrote:
>I was of the view that we should give NRO NC the function of the review
>committee. The reasoning is:
>1. No burden of constituting a different body. NRO NC is already
>2. NRO NC is representative of all RIRs and established in ICANN as ASO AC
>3. The burden of review committee is minimal and can be a running Agenda
>item in ASO AC regular meetings.

I prefer to keep them separate.  The NRO-NC/ASO-AC is involved with
policy development, but the Review Committee would be involved in
monitoring the performance after policy is ratified.  These are very
different roles.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

More information about the CRISP mailing list