[CRISP-TEAM] Working on editing: reordering answers to match orders of questions
Alan Barrett
apb at cequrux.com
Mon Dec 22 12:57:29 CET 2014
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>To start, I'd like to suggest we split 6 sections into threes and each
>person reviews 2 sections.
>
>This is a tentative suggestion on who covers which part - if there is a
>set of Sections you feel strongly about, we can swap.
>
> Sections I & II : Izumi
> Sections III and IV : Michael
> Sections V & VI : Alan
I have reviewed sections V (NTIA Requirements) and VI (Community
Process), and made some changes. I attach two plain text files
containing the "before" and "after" versions of these two sections.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
-------------- next part --------------
V. NTIA Requirements
>>> Additionally, NTIA has established that the transition proposal must
>>> meet the following five requirements:
>>>
>>> * Support and enhance the multistakeholder model;
>>> * Maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet
>>> DNS;
>>> * Meet the needs and expectation of the global customers and
>>> partners of the IANA services;
>>> * Maintain the openness of the Internet.
>>> * The proposal must not replace the NTIA role with a
>>> government-led or an intergovernmental organization solution.
>>>
>>> This section should explain how your community?s proposal meets
>>> these requirements and how it responds to the global interest in
>>> the IANA functions.
The proposal for the IANA stewardship transition for the Internet number
registries builds upon the existing, successful framework used by the
Internet number community today. The major characteristics of this
approach include:
1. Global number policy development which is open and transparent to any
and all participants
2. Continuance of existing IANA service levels, escalation processes,
and reporting mechanisms
3. Maintenance of independent review and ratification for developed
global Internet number resource policy
4. Continued use of periodic third-party independent reviews of
accountability and transparency of processes
5. No change of the existing IANA operator for maximum stability and
security of operational processes and systems
6. Accountable, member-based, globally-distributed Regional Internet
Registry organizations providing routine IANA operational oversight for
the Internet number registries
As a result of the approach taken (and its characteristics as outlined
above), it is clear that the proposal from the Internet number community
meets the stated NTIA requirements.
VI. Community Process
>>> This section should describe the process your community used for
>>> developing this proposal, including:
>>>
>>> * The steps that were taken to develop the proposal and to determine
>>> consensus.
>>> * Links to announcements, agendas, mailing lists, consultations and
>>> meeting proceedings.
>>> * An assessment of the level of consensus behind your community?s
>>> proposal, including a description of areas of contention or
>>> disagreement.
Steps and timeline for proposal development and links
to announcements, mailing lists, and proceedings -
https://www.nro.net/nro-and-internet-governance/iana-oversight/timeline-for-rirsengagement-in-iana-stewardship-transition-process
Assessment of consensus level ? TBD
Each of the five RIR communities is discussing the IANA stewardship
issues via mailing lists, at their RIR meetings and in other community
forums. While these discussions have been uniformly open and
transparent, with all discussions archived on mailing lists and meeting
records, each community has adopted a specific process of their own
choosing to reach an agreed community output.
AFRINIC:
The AFRINIC community held a consultative meeting on 25 May to 6
June 2014 during the Africa Internet Summit (AIS'2014) in Djibouti
in the "IANA oversight transition" workshop. As a follow up to
the meeting, AFRINIC setup a mailing list to provide a platform
for the African Internet community to discuss the IANA Oversight
Transition process. The mailing list was announced on July 4, 2014 to
develop a community position. The list and its archives can be found
at: https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ianaoversight
A Dedicated web portal was setup for sharing information on the IANA
stewardship transition with the AFRINIC community and is also available
at http://afrinic.net/en/community/ianaoversight-transition
AFRINIC also conducted a survey seeking community input on the IANA
Stewardship Transition. The results of the survey are published at:
http://afrinic.net/images/stories/Initiatives/%20survey%20on%20the%20iana%20stewardship%20transition.pdf
The last face-to-face meeting at which IANA oversight transition
consultations were held with the community was during the AFRINIC-21
meeting in Mauritius, 22-28 November 2014. The recordings of the session
are available at http://meeting.afrinic.net/afrinic-21/en/vod
Discussions continued on the ianaoversight at afrinic.net mailing list,
until the closure of the comments from the number resources communities
set by the CRISP Team on 12th Jan 2015.
APNIC:
APNIC, as the secretariat for the APNIC community has
set up a public mailing list(announced on 1 Apr 2014)
to develop a community position, and have discussions
about the proposal from the region on IANA stewardship
transition: http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/IANAxfer
Webpage, dedicated to sharing up-to-date information on the IANA
stewardship transition was set up, for the APNIC community members
and wider community members who are interested in this issue can be
updated: http://www.apnic.net/community/iana-transition
Draft proposal was discussed at the dedicated session at the APNIC
38 Meeting, which saw the general community consensus. The meeting
provided remote participation tools to enable wider participation from
communities across Asia Pacific and beyond, with live webcasts well as
Adobe Connect virtual conference room.
https://conference.apnic.net/38/program#iana
The discussions continued on the "ianaxfer at apnic.net." mailing list,
until the closure of the comments from the number resources communities
set by CRISP Team as 12th Jan 2015.
ARIN:
LACNIC:
RIPE:
The RIPE community agreed at the RIPE 68 Meeting in May
2014 that the development of a community position on IANA
stewardship should take place in the RIPE Cooperation
Working Group, and via that working group's public mailing
list: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/wglists/cooperation
The RIPE NCC, as secretariat for the RIPE community, also facilitated
discussions on the IANA stewardship in national and regional forums
across the RIPE NCC service region. Summaries of these discussions were
posted to the RIPE Cooperation Working Group mailing list and on the
RIPE website: https://www.ripe.net/iana-discussions
Between September and November 2014, RIPE community discussion
centered around developing a set of principles reflecting
the communities primary concerns in the development of an
alternative IANA stewardship arrangement. These discussions
are reflected in the discussions on the mailing list from that
time: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/cooperationwg/
Discussions at the RIPE 69 Meeting in November 2014 saw general
community consensus on the principles discussed on the mailing list, and
support expressed for the three community members selected to join the
Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship Proposal (CRISP) team.
RIPE Cooperation Working Group
Session: https://ripe69.ripe.net/programme/meetingplan/coop-wg/#session1
RIPE 69 Closing Plenary Session:
https://ripe69.ripe.net/archives/video/10112/
On 16 October 2014, the NRO Executive Council proposed the formation of
a Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship Proposal (CRISP) team to develop a
single Internet numbering community proposal to the IANA Stewardship
Coordination Group (ICG). Each RIR community selected three members (two
community members and one RIR staff) to participate in the team. The
participants selected were:
AFRINIC Region
Alan P. Barrett ? Independent Consultant
Mwendwa Kivuva ? Network Infrastructure Services, University of Nairobi
Ernest Byaruhanga (Appointed RIR staff)
ARIN Region
Bill Woodcock ? President and Research Director of Packet Clearing House
John Sweeting ? Sr. Director, Network Architecture & Engineering at
Time Warner Cable
Michael Abejuela (Appointed RIR staff)
APNIC Region
Dr Govind ? CEO NIXI
Izumi Okutani ? Policy Liaison JPNIC
Craig Ng (Appointed RIR staff)
LACNIC Region
Nico Scheper - Curacao IX
Esteban Lescano - Cabase Argentina
Andr?s Piazza (Appointed RIR staff)
RIPE NCC Region
Nurani Nimpuno ? Head of Outreach & Communications at Netnod
Andrei Robachevsky ? Technology Programme Manager at the Internet Society
Paul Rendek (Appointed RIR staff)
-------------- next part --------------
V. NTIA Requirements
>>> Additionally, NTIA has established that the transition proposal must
>>> meet the following five requirements:
>>>
>>> * Support and enhance the multistakeholder model;
>>> * Maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet
>>> DNS;
>>> * Meet the needs and expectation of the global customers and
>>> partners of the IANA services;
>>> * Maintain the openness of the Internet.
>>> * The proposal must not replace the NTIA role with a
>>> government-led or an intergovernmental organization solution.
>>>
>>> This section should explain how your community?s proposal meets
>>> these requirements and how it responds to the global interest in
>>> the IANA functions.
The proposal for the IANA stewardship transition for the Internet number
registries builds upon the existing, successful framework used by the
Internet number community today. The major characteristics of this
approach include:
1. Global number policy development which is open and transparent to any
and all participants
2. Continuance of existing IANA service levels, escalation processes,
and reporting mechanisms
3. Maintenance of independent review and ratification for developed
global Internet number resource policy
4. Continued use of periodic third-party independent reviews of
accountability and transparency of processes
5. No change of the existing IANA operator for maximum stability and
security of operational processes and systems
6. Accountable, member-based, globally-distributed Regional Internet
Registry organizations providing routine IANA operational oversight for
the Internet number registries
7. The only new organization that is proposed is the Review Committee
that will be established to advise and assist the NRO Executive
Council in its periodic review of the service level provided by the
IANA functions operator.
As a result of the approach taken (and its characteristics as outlined
above), it is clear that the proposal from the Internet number community
meets the stated NTIA requirements.
VI. Community Process
>>> This section should describe the process your community used for
>>> developing this proposal, including:
>>>
>>> * The steps that were taken to develop the proposal and to determine
>>> consensus.
>>> * Links to announcements, agendas, mailing lists, consultations and
>>> meeting proceedings.
>>> * An assessment of the level of consensus behind your community?s
>>> proposal, including a description of areas of contention or
>>> disagreement.
1. Regional and global process
Each of the five RIR communities is discussing the IANA stewardship
issues via mailing lists, at their RIR meetings and in other community
forums. While these discussions have been uniformly open and
transparent, with all discussions archived on mailing lists and meeting
records, each community has adopted a specific process of their own
choosing to reach an agreed community output.
The results from the five regional processes fed a global process that
produced this document. More details about the regional and global
processes are given below, interspersed with link to relevant documents.
2. AFRINIC regional process
The AFRINIC community held a consultative meeting on 25 May to 6
June 2014 during the Africa Internet Summit (AIS'2014) in Djibouti
in the "IANA oversight transition" workshop. As a follow up to
the meeting, AFRINIC setup a mailing list to provide a platform
for the African Internet community to discuss the IANA Oversight
Transition process. The mailing list was announced on July 4, 2014 to
develop a community position. The list and its archives can be found
at: https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ianaoversight
A Dedicated web portal was setup for sharing information on the IANA
stewardship transition with the AFRINIC community and is also available
at http://afrinic.net/en/community/ianaoversight-transition
AFRINIC also conducted a survey seeking community input on the IANA
Stewardship Transition. The results of the survey are published at:
http://afrinic.net/images/stories/Initiatives/%20survey%20on%20the%20iana%20stewardship%20transition.pdf
The last face-to-face meeting at which IANA oversight transition
consultations were held with the community was during the AFRINIC-21
meeting in Mauritius, 22-28 November 2014. The recordings of the session
are available at http://meeting.afrinic.net/afrinic-21/en/vod
Discussions continued on the ianaoversight at afrinic.net mailing list,
until the closure of the comments from the number resources communities
set by the CRISP Team on 12th Jan 2015.
3. APNIC regional process
APNIC, as the secretariat for the APNIC community has
set up a public mailing list(announced on 1 Apr 2014)
to develop a community position, and have discussions
about the proposal from the region on IANA stewardship
transition: http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/IANAxfer
Webpage, dedicated to sharing up-to-date information on the IANA
stewardship transition was set up, for the APNIC community members
and wider community members who are interested in this issue can be
updated: http://www.apnic.net/community/iana-transition
Draft proposal was discussed at the dedicated session at the APNIC
38 Meeting, which saw the general community consensus. The meeting
provided remote participation tools to enable wider participation from
communities across Asia Pacific and beyond, with live webcasts well as
Adobe Connect virtual conference room.
https://conference.apnic.net/38/program#iana
The discussions continued on the "ianaxfer at apnic.net." mailing list,
until the closure of the comments from the number resources communities
set by CRISP Team as 12th Jan 2015.
4. ARIN regional process
<TBD>
5. LACNIC regional process
<TBD>
6. RIPE regional process
The RIPE community agreed at the RIPE 68 Meeting in May
2014 that the development of a community position on IANA
stewardship should take place in the RIPE Cooperation
Working Group, and via that working group's public mailing
list: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/wglists/cooperation
The RIPE NCC, as secretariat for the RIPE community, also facilitated
discussions on the IANA stewardship in national and regional forums
across the RIPE NCC service region. Summaries of these discussions were
posted to the RIPE Cooperation Working Group mailing list and on the
RIPE website: https://www.ripe.net/iana-discussions
Between September and November 2014, RIPE community discussion
centered around developing a set of principles reflecting
the communities primary concerns in the development of an
alternative IANA stewardship arrangement. These discussions
are reflected in the discussions on the mailing list from that
time: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/cooperationwg/
Discussions at the RIPE 69 Meeting in November 2014 saw general
community consensus on the principles discussed on the mailing list, and
support expressed for the three community members selected to join the
Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship Proposal (CRISP) team.
RIPE Cooperation Working Group
Session: https://ripe69.ripe.net/programme/meetingplan/coop-wg/#session1
RIPE 69 Closing Plenary Session:
https://ripe69.ripe.net/archives/video/10112/
7. Global process (CRISP Team)
On 16 October 2014, the NRO Executive Council proposed the formation of
a Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship Proposal (CRISP) team to develop a
single Internet numbering community proposal to the IANA Stewardship
Coordination Group (ICG). Each RIR community selected three members (two
community members and one RIR staff) to participate in the team. The
participants selected were:
AFRINIC Region
Alan P. Barrett ? Independent Consultant
Mwendwa Kivuva ? Network Infrastructure Services, University of Nairobi
Ernest Byaruhanga (Appointed RIR staff)
ARIN Region
Bill Woodcock ? President and Research Director of Packet Clearing House
John Sweeting ? Sr. Director, Network Architecture & Engineering at
Time Warner Cable
Michael Abejuela (Appointed RIR staff)
APNIC Region
Dr Govind ? CEO NIXI
Izumi Okutani ? Policy Liaison JPNIC
Craig Ng (Appointed RIR staff)
LACNIC Region
Nico Scheper - Curacao IX
Esteban Lescano - Cabase Argentina
Andr?s Piazza (Appointed RIR staff)
RIPE NCC Region
Nurani Nimpuno ? Head of Outreach & Communications at Netnod
Andrei Robachevsky ? Technology Programme Manager at the Internet Society
Paul Rendek (Appointed RIR staff)
Steps and timeline for proposal development and links to announcements,
mailing lists, and proceedings of the CRISP process are available at
https://www.nro.net/nro-and-internet-governance/iana-oversight/timeline-for-rirsengagement-in-iana-stewardship-transition-process
8. Assessment of consensus level
<TBD>
More information about the CRISP
mailing list