[CRISP-TEAM] Suggested text: Review Commitee

[Andrei Robachevsky]

Hi Michael,

It seems none of my proposals regarding overlaps were included in the
new text:

OLD:

The specific registries that are administered by the IANA per the
authority delegated to the Internet Number Registry System are
"Autonomous System (AS) Numbers", "IANA IPv4 Address Space Registry",
and "IPv6 Global Unicast Address Assignments". Note that within each
IANA registry, there are also special-purpose values, and those
special-purpose values are outside the Internet Numbers Registry System
and instead administered under the direction of the IETF. The
delineation of the specific ranges delegated to the Internet Number
Registry system is provided in RFC 7249.


NEW:

The IETF is responsible for policy relating to the entire IP address
space and AS number space.  Through the IANA protocol parameters
registries, the IETF delegates unicast IP address ("IANA IPv4 Address
Space Registry" and "IPv6 Global Unicast Allocations Registry") and AS
number space ("Autonomous System (AS) Numbers Registry”) to the RIR
system [RFC7020]. Note that within each IANA registry, there are also
special-purpose registries, which are outside the Internet Numbers
Registry System and instead administered under the direction of the
IETF. The delineation of the specific ranges delegated to the Internet
Number Registry system is provided in RFC 7249.


And

OLD:

The five open regional RIR communities develop the global policies under
which allocations from the IANA-managed pools are made. The RIRs
facilitate the open, transparent and bottom-up processes via which the
communities develop and agree these policies. There are currently three
global policies relating to management of the global pools of IPv4
addresses, IPv6 addresses and AS Numbers. There is a fourth global
policy agreed by the RIR communities, ICP-2, "Criteria for Establishment
of New Regional Internet Registries".


NEW:

Allocations from these registries delegated to the Internet Number
Registry system are performed by IANA following the global policies,
developed by RIR communities following a global policy development
process [REFERENCE]. This is an open, transparent and bottom-up
processes facilitated by the RIRs. There are currently three global
policies relating to management of the global pools of IPv4 addresses,
IPv6 addresses and AS Numbers. There is a fourth global policy agreed by
the RIR communities, ICP-2, "Criteria for Establishment of New Regional
Internet Registries".


I was under the impression that we reached agreement on these changes.

Regards,

Andrei

Michael Abejuela wrote on 18/12/14 13:39:
> Hello Izumi and rest of the CRISP Team,
> 
> For the groups review and comment, please find attached a clean and
> redline version of the updated draft proposal.  In this version, you will
> observe inclusion of revisions to the language regarding the issue of
> ICANN Board ratification that was discussed yesterday.  As you all saw, I
> proposed initial language; and based on helpful feedback from Bill and
> Alan, I updated the language as you will see in this draft.
> 
> In addition, Izumi was kind enough to propose language on the Review
> Committee issue which I have also discussed with Andres and in this draft,
> you will observe a slight update to Izumi¹s initial proposed language.  I
> tried to capture the nature of the comments as well as make it in line
> with the rest of the proposal language.
> 
> Please let me know if I have missed anything or if there are any desired
> edits.  I assume there will be substantive discussion of these edits on
> the call today.  
> 
> Sincerely,
> -Michael
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>