[CRISP-TEAM] CRISP TEAM - revision to proposal - Section III

Alan Barrett apb at cequrux.com
Wed Dec 17 18:15:27 CET 2014

On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Michael Abejuela wrote:
> New text:
> While it has not been utilized with respect to Internet number 
> registries, the existing NTIA contract for the IANA services 
> for the Internet number registries also provides a point of 
> oversight for the policy authority for the Internet number 
> registry system. To resolve the inherent conflict with the 
> contemplated IANA functions operator (ICANN) serving both a role 
> as a contractor and as a body responsible for ratifying globally 
> approved policies under the gPDP, an amendment to the ASO MOU is 
> proposed to remove ICANN as the ratifying body under the gPDP.

Will there be a different ratifying body instead of ICANN?  I 
think the idea is that the gPDP will proceed as before, up to and 
including the point where the NRO-NC ratifies the proposal, but 
then the proposal will immediately become policy, without needing 
to be ratified by the ICANN Board.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

More information about the CRISP mailing list