[CRISP-TEAM] A proposal for the LACNIC CRISP Members

Andres Piazza andres at lacnic.net
Wed Dec 17 13:07:04 CET 2014

Dear Izumi

I really appreciate the effort as a chair to understand the proposal and 
help the rest of us to understand.

El 12/16/14 11:46 PM, Izumi Okutani escribió:
> (2014/12/17 7:39), Craig Ng wrote:
>> On 17/12/2014 8:46 am, "Alan Barrett" <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Andres Piazza wrote:
>>>> Taking in consideration that the MONC proposal made by LACNIC
>>>> community could bring some pushback from other members of
>>>> the group, and having heard about the issues that may be
>>>> unconfortable for the rest of the CRISP Members, we would like
>>>> to propose a compromise idea:
>>> How often would the oversight council be convened?  I suggest that
>>> convening annually might be too often.  What about convening at
>>> least every three years, or more often at the request of any two
>>> of the RIRs?
>> Perhaps - but I think this would be a decision for the NRO EC to make. The
>> CRISP team can, of course, make a suggestion about this point for
>> consideration by the NRO EC.
> Thanks for clarifying this Craig. I also feel Alan's suggestion sounds
> pragmatic, at least in terms of selecting NRO representatives.
> I think it takes resources to select members every year. In addition, in
> terms of continuity and consistency of the review, it may be worth
> considering whether selecting members every year would best serve this
> purpose.

I agree with this. Probably the mandate of the members of the council 
should last more than 1 year.

> I note this would be a decision for the NRO EC to make -

I hope this is something that CRISP could decide. I personally like Alan 
Barret´s approach.



More information about the CRISP mailing list