[CRISP-TEAM] A proposal for the LACNIC CRISP Members

Andres Piazza andres at lacnic.net
Wed Dec 17 12:55:46 CET 2014

Dear John, thanks for the questions. Here I go:

El 12/16/14 1:14 PM, Sweeting, John escribió:
> On 12/15/14, 4:34 PM, "Andres Piazza" <andres at lacnic.net> wrote:
>> Dear Colleagues,
>> Taking in consideration that the MONC proposal made by LACNIC community
>> could bring some pushback from other members of the group, and having
>> heard about the issues that may be unconfortable for the rest of the
>> CRISP Members, we would like to propose a compromise idea:
>> - Eliminating the word Mulsitakeholder from the language of the proposal.
>> - Not referring to the Council at the MoU level. We can mention the
>> Council in the CRISP output just as a advisory body created by the
>> NRO-EC for specific oversight purposes.
> Can you list some examples of these please?

Originally the MONC proposal at the LACNIC region 
http://www.lacnic.net/web/transicion/inicio conceives the MONC as a 
¨Oversight Multistakeholder Council that is refrerred at the MoU between 
RIRs and IANA Operator.

We are trying to erase this ¨requirement¨ and let the NRO-EC to create a 
concil in a less formal way.



More information about the CRISP mailing list