[CRISP-TEAM] Checking points before initial draft publish

[Paul Rendek]

+1

On 12/17/14 11:19 AM, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>>> Throughout our response, it may be useful to change the order of
>>> paragraphs or sentences to better match the order of bullet points
>>> in the ICG request.
>>
>> Agree. The same suggetion is made by Andrei and myself, so I think
>> it's something we should work on, before submmitting the proposal to
>> ICG.
>>
>> For the initial draft, let's confirm
>>  - who is/are willing to work on suggested texts AND
>>  - whether we can incorporate this in time by 18th
>>
>> It will be great if we can - but if we are too short of time, we can
>> perhaps add additional section in the announcement, "Work in
>> progress- expected to be reflected in the 2nd version".
>>
>> Does this sounds like a reasonable approach?
>
> I like the approach of flagging this as an issue to be addressed in a
> future draft.  There is not time to do that reorganisation today
> before 19 December.
>
>>> In section I, the interdependency with the IETF is broader than just
>>> the special purpose values.  The IETF defines the entirety of the
>>> number spaces, including portions for special use, portions for
>>> ordinary use, and portions reserved for future use.  Only the
>>> "ordinary" portions of the address space are handled by the RIRs.
>>
>> That makes sense. I agree.  Are you willing/anyone can volunteer to
>> work on the suggested text?
>>
>> I'll create a seperate thread, so we consider this point.
>
> I'll respond in the separate thread.
>
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>