[CRISP-TEAM] Checking points before initial draft publish

Alan Barrett apb at cequrux.com
Wed Dec 17 12:19:50 CET 2014

On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> Throughout our response, it may be useful to change the order 
>> of paragraphs or sentences to better match the order of bullet 
>> points in the ICG request.
> Agree. The same suggetion is made by Andrei and myself, so I 
> think it's something we should work on, before submmitting the 
> proposal to ICG.
> For the initial draft, let's confirm
>  - who is/are willing to work on suggested texts AND
>  - whether we can incorporate this in time by 18th
> It will be great if we can - but if we are too short of time, we 
> can perhaps add additional section in the announcement, "Work in 
> progress- expected to be reflected in the 2nd version".
> Does this sounds like a reasonable approach?

I like the approach of flagging this as an issue to be addressed 
in a future draft.  There is not time to do that reorganisation 
today before 19 December.

>> In section I, the interdependency with the IETF is broader than 
>> just the special purpose values.  The IETF defines the entirety 
>> of the number spaces, including portions for special use, 
>> portions for ordinary use, and portions reserved for future 
>> use.  Only the "ordinary" portions of the address space are 
>> handled by the RIRs.
> That makes sense. I agree.  Are you willing/anyone can volunteer 
> to work on the suggested text?
> I'll create a seperate thread, so we consider this point.

I'll respond in the separate thread.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

More information about the CRISP mailing list