[CRISP-TEAM] Checking points before initial draft publish
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Wed Dec 17 02:54:27 CET 2014
(2014/12/17 8:08), Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> While waiting for revised draft, I would like to proceed in parallel
>> to prepare for final checking before we share the initial draft.
>> Alan, I wonder if you would be able to help me in double checking, on
>> the points we should cover in the draft?
>> Feedback from other members of the CRISP team would be very welcome as
>> well ofcourse.
> Throughout our response, it may be useful to change the order of
> paragraphs or sentences to better match the order of bullet points in
> the ICG request.
Agree. The same suggetion is made by Andrei and myself, so I think it's
something we should work on, before submmitting the proposal to ICG.
For the initial draft, let's confirm
- who is/are willing to work on suggested texts AND
- whether we can incorporate this in time by 18th
It will be great if we can - but if we are too short of time,
we can perhaps add additional section in the announcement,
"Work in progress- expected to be reflected in the 2nd version".
Does this sounds like a reasonable approach?
> In section I, the interdependency with the IETF is broader than just the
> special purpose values. The IETF defines the entirety of the number
> spaces, including portions for special use, portions for ordinary use,
> and portions reserved for future use. Only the "ordinary" portions of
> the address space are handled by the RIRs.
That makes sense. I agree.
Are you willing/anyone can volunteer to work on the suggested text?
I'll create a seperate thread, so we consider this point.
More information about the CRISP