[CRISP-TEAM] A proposal for the LACNIC CRISP Members
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Wed Dec 17 02:46:19 CET 2014
(2014/12/17 7:39), Craig Ng wrote:
> On 17/12/2014 8:46 am, "Alan Barrett" <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Andres Piazza wrote:
>>> Taking in consideration that the MONC proposal made by LACNIC
>>> community could bring some pushback from other members of
>>> the group, and having heard about the issues that may be
>>> unconfortable for the rest of the CRISP Members, we would like
>>> to propose a compromise idea:
>> How often would the oversight council be convened? I suggest that
>> convening annually might be too often. What about convening at
>> least every three years, or more often at the request of any two
>> of the RIRs?
> Perhaps - but I think this would be a decision for the NRO EC to make. The
> CRISP team can, of course, make a suggestion about this point for
> consideration by the NRO EC.
Thanks for clarifying this Craig. I also feel Alan's suggestion sounds
pragmatic, at least in terms of selecting NRO representatives.
I think it takes resources to select members every year. In addition, in
terms of continuity and consistency of the review, it may be worth
considering whether selecting members every year would best serve this
I note this would be a decision for the NRO EC to make -
Taking this in consideration, if other CRISP members have comments about
this as well, we can perhaps consider possibility of putting comments
from CRISP team to be shared to NRO EC as reference.
More information about the CRISP