[CRISP-TEAM] II. Existing, Pre-Transition Arrangements "A. Policy Sources"

Michael Abejuela mabejuela at arin.net
Tue Dec 16 23:09:27 CET 2014

Acknowledged and I will make sure any changes are clearly highlighted
(likely by redline) to ensure a more efficient discussion and review by
the CRISP team.


Michael R. Abejuela

Associate General Counsel


3635 Concorde Parkway

Suite 200

Chantilly, VA 20151

(703) 227-9875 (p)

(703) 263-0111 (f)

mabejuela at arin.net


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, copy, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.

On 12/16/14, 4:37 PM, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

>Michael, I would be appreciate it if could do the same - tentatively
>reflect it if possible and highlight, so we can reconfirm at the coming
>Makes sense Alan  - This will match nicely with suggested addition on
>the last paragraph.
>To all,
>This ofcourse doesn't mean to close comments for your feebacks.
>Please continue to comment if you have other opinions to my and/or
>Alan's suggested texts.
>(2014/12/17 6:28), Alan Barrett wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>>> In this section, it says "If there are distinct sources of policy or
>>> policy development for different IANA activities, then please describe
>>> these separately".
>>> Assuming this means we should share policies for IPv4, IPv6 and ASN, I
>>> welcome comments on my suggested text below. (as well as on my
>>> interpretation)
>> I'd suggest adding text like this near the beginning of the response to
>> section II:
>> The relevant IANA activities are the allocation of IPv4 addresses,
>> IPv6 addresses, and ASNs, to the RIRs; and also the delegation of
>> *.IN-ADDR.ARPA and *.IPv6.ARPA domains to match the allocation of IPv4
>> and IPv6 addresses.  The global policy development process described
>> below is used for all of the number-related IANA activities, but the
>> policy that *.IN-ADDR.ARPA and *.IP6.ARPA domains must be delegated
>> following IPv4 and IPv6 address allocation is specified by the IETF
>> (most recently in RFC 3172).
>> (Then move on to a description of the global policy development process,
>> with links to the ASO MoU and Attachment A, much as already appears in
>> the draft.)
>>> To Michael:
>>>  - Would you tentatively try to reflect this text if possible, and
>>>    perhaps highlight, so we can confirm at the 3rd call, whether
>>>    everyone is OK?
>>> Add to the last paragraph
>>> Based on the global policy development process, global policies are
>>> developed for IPv4 address, IPv6 address and ASN, which IANA will base
>>> respectively, when making distribution of these resources.
>>> 1. Global Policies
>>> - Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Policy For Allocation of
>>>   IPv6 Blocks to Regional Internet Registries
>>> - Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Policy for Allocation of
>>>   ASN Blocks to Regional Internet Registries     C
>>> - Global Policy for Post Exhaustion IPv4 Allocation Mechanisms by the
>>>   IANA
>>>  https://www.nro.net/policies
>> Listing the current global policies is probably a good idea, but the
>> question that we are trying to answer (in this part of the response) is
>> about the policy development process.
>> --apb (Alan Barrett)
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>CRISP mailing list
>CRISP at nro.net

More information about the CRISP mailing list